informed that the complainant apart from
Retinitis Pigmentosa he was also having cataract in both the eyes, for which the
opposite parties have suggested surgery ... diagnosed the eye vision and did wrong operation as if
he had cataract and implanted intraocular lenses. After the operation there was
complete loss
existence of the policy, his wife
Sumitraben was operated for left eye cataract. The operation was
carried out on 15.05.2017 in the Raghudeep Eye Hospital ... requested the insurance
company to pay rest of the amount towards the cataract operation.
The said request was not replied. The complainant gave the notice
eyes checked up and thereafter, advised
him go for cataract surgery on the left eye; that on 25.4.2017, as
per the advise of opposite party ... paid Rs.5000/- as an
advance and obtained receipt; that on 29.4.2017 cataract surgery
was performed on his left eye, but vision was lost completely
month of October, 2000 when he was diagnosed to be having a cataract problem in both the eyes and was advised to undergo surgery ... have filed a joint Written Statement admitting the conduction of the first cataract surgery on 16.01.2001; that the Complainant paid
there was no such history of retina diseases of the complainant except cataract.
It actually there was history of retina diseases and detachment alongwith cataract ... that case Dr. R. C. Paul should not operate cataract and when cataract operatin was done what was the need for second operation that
Complainant on 23.09.2008 approached the Treating Doctor for poor vision and cataract treatment of the left eye. After examining the Complainant, the Treating Doctor prescribed ... Treating Doctor on 18.02.2009 and the Treating Doctor conducted the cataract operation on 19.02.2009 and charged a sum of Rs. 15,060/- for the same
Fellowship
Hospital, Chandmari, Rajnandaon. During the examination, it was found that
the cataracts in both the eyes of the complainant, were ripen, therefore the
operation ... where after examination he came to know that the cataract of the eyes were not
ripen, pre-mature operation has been conducted. The back retina
problem in his right eye and they
advised him to undergo cataract surgery which was conducted upon him on
10.09.2008. The first respondent
submitted that ... diminish vision in his both eyes and on
examination, the appellant found cataract in his both eyes and advised for
cataract of his right
complainant's eye and found that the complainant was suffering from cataract in his right eye. On 31.08.2007, the answering opposite party operated complainant ... right eye by PCIOL operation procedure through Small Incision Cataract Surgery (Stichless) with care and caution after some pathological tests and discharged the patient-complainant
party. It was contended that the particular advertisement was not related to cataract and that the complainant approached the opposite parties for defective vision ... cataract in both his eyes. Thus, the opposite parties prayed for disposal of the complaint in CC No. 258/2007.
3. Before the Forum below
