Nursing Home) in giving treatment to the
complainant viz., in relation to cataract surgery of his right eye with Intra
Occular Lens implant ... August 1996
he went to Sankara Nethralaya, Chennai for the removal of cataract from his
right eye. The doctor after examination of his eyes suggested
drawing 2600 Dehram per month as salary. He developed
cataract in his left eye and came to India for curing the defect and
approached respondents ... hospital of respondent no.2 in September,
2002 and he was having cataract in his left eye. On his examination, he was
fully apprised
Sight‟ in the „Hindustan Times‟ dated
31st October, 2009 claiming cure for cataract by Breakthrough
Innovation in cataract surgery through a drug named Akreos ... improved methodology and improved
equipment availability of the procedure involved in a cataract
surgery.
7. In this context it would be relevant to refer
negligence on the part of Dr.P.P.Kunhiraman in doing the cataract operation in the left eye of the complainant and in the further ... opposite party who conducted the surgical procedures and treatment for the cataract to the left eye of the complainant at the 2nd opposite party Ashwini
negligence on the part of Dr.P.P.Kunhiraman in doing the cataract operation in the left eye of the complainant and in the further ... opposite party who conducted the surgical procedures and treatment for the cataract to the left eye of the complainant at the 2nd opposite party Ashwini
party. It was contended that the particular advertisement was not related to cataract and that the complainant approached the opposite parties for defective vision ... cataract in both his eyes. Thus, the opposite parties prayed for disposal of the complaint in CC No. 258/2007.
3. Before the Forum below
party. It was contended that the particular advertisement was not related to cataract and that the complainant approached the opposite parties for defective vision ... cataract in both his eyes. Thus, the opposite parties prayed for disposal of the complaint in CC No. 258/2007.
3. Before the Forum below
Arni,
Tq.&Dist.Dhule approached to appellant for surgery of cataract.
Appellant is Opthalmogist practicing in Dhule city. On 18.1.2004
complainant first time approached ... approached to appellant, at that time
appellant informed her that surgery for cataract is to be performed
and lens will be installed so that complainant
medically treating the complainant in connection with the complainant's cataract to her left eye. The complainant claimed ... left eye of the complainant was adversely affected by the development of cataract and that the appellant/opposite party ophthalmologist advised surgery for removal
opposite party hospital on 28.5.2001 and on the same day itself cataract surgery to the left eye was done and discharged on the same ... account of the negligence of the opposite parties in conducting the cataract surgery that the present condition of the complainant took place. It is also
