issue appropriate writ directing the respondents to strictly adhere to the catch-up rule and revise the seniority of all the petitioners in comparison ... Punjab & ors., reported in (1999) 7 SCC 209, introduced the catch-up rule and held that if the senior general candidate is promoted then
issue appropriate writ directing the respondents to strictly adhere to the catch-up rule and revise the seniority of all the petitioners in comparison ... Punjab & ors., reported in (1999) 7 SCC 209, introduced the catch-up rule and held that if the senior general candidate is promoted then
issue appropriate writ directing the respondents to strictly adhere to the catch-up rule and revise the seniority of all the petitioners in comparison ... Punjab & ors., reported in (1999) 7 SCC 209, introduced the catch-up rule and held that if the senior general candidate is promoted then
issue appropriate writ directing the respondents to strictly adhere to the catch-up rule and revise the seniority of all the petitioners in comparison ... Punjab & ors., reported in (1999) 7 SCC 209, introduced the catch-up rule and held that if the senior general candidate is promoted then
issue appropriate writ directing the respondents to strictly adhere to the catch-up rule and revise the seniority of all the petitioners in comparison ... Punjab & ors., reported in (1999) 7 SCC 209, introduced the catch-up rule and held that if the senior general candidate is promoted then
issue appropriate writ directing the respondents to strictly adhere to the catch-up rule and revise the seniority of all the petitioners in comparison ... Punjab & ors., reported in (1999) 7 SCC 209, introduced the catch-up rule and held that if the senior general candidate is promoted then
issue appropriate writ directing the respondents to strictly adhere to the catch-up rule and revise the seniority of all the petitioners in comparison ... Punjab & ors., reported in (1999) 7 SCC 209, introduced the catch-up rule and held that if the senior general candidate is promoted then
Offices (A.S.P.O.) and as per the
"catch up" Rule, he again regained his seniority and a seniority list
was issued ... respondents.
5. It is contended that ignoring the "catch up" Rule and the fact
that the petitioner was senior to the respondents, petitioner
case cannot be gone into in these contempt proceedings. The catch up rule of 1997 has been superseded by new Notification dated 11.09.2011. The State ... further submitted that there is no constitutional sanctity to catch up rule i.e. regaining seniority rule. So far as submission with regard
case cannot be gone into in these contempt proceedings. The catch up rule of 1997 has been superseded by new Notification dated 11.09.2011. The State ... further submitted that there is no constitutional sanctity to catch up rule i.e. regaining seniority rule. So far as submission with regard
