Annexure-2 to this petition. The disputed property is a 'path' marked ... plaintiffs. The plaintiffs claim to use the disputed path for purpose of their cattle, bullock cart, etc. The ancestral part of the plaintiffs' property
public path exists within the
land of Jagadish Kalita as stated by the petitioner, the path cannot be
considered as a public path over ... include the public path leading from National Highway 152
to the paddy field for ingress or egress of the cattle of the local villagers
essentially operates as a
national guideline for law makers, a two-way path has been
devised. The first is imposing duty on the State ... prohibiting slaughter of
cows and calves and other milch and draught cattle. Under the
chapter on Fundamental Duties, a citizen is required to protect
they were about to reach the temple, Kamlesh and Hansraj
obstructed their path and started abusing them and when he objected
to this, Kamlesh ... alongwith his
brother, Kamlesh had gone towards Bali forest to graze his cattle and
at 3.30 pm, while they were coming back to their home
8539/2022
7
for the purpose of widening the trekking path and had tarred
the parking space, thereby altering its nature, it prima facie
appears ... timber or produce, together with all tools, ropes, chains, boats,
vehicles and cattle used in committing any such offence may be
seized by any Forest
There used to be petty quarrels between them in respect
of the path way etc. On the date of incident ... complainant along with
his son Prabhu gowda had taken out their cattle for
grazing, accused No.1 picked up quarrel with
written statement, defendants 3 to 5 clearly
stated that the path way in the 2nd item mentioned by the Plaintiffs was
already subdivided ... Natham vacant site, has been used by
him for grazing his cattle. If the 1st plaintiff had been indulgent and
smarter, he ought to have
owner of the truck that was caught allegedly by the police carrying cattle. He says that he has no involvement in the crime as alleged ... task of loading 'Maurang' but he strayed from his path and perhaps was involved. The petitioner has been falsely implicated
true that
the suit property is used as a path-way or cart track, the same would have
found place in the sale deed itself ... plaintiff and his brother, but there is no
whisper about the cart path-way. The portion which was allotted to the
plaintiff in the said
portion, have high
handedly blocked the suit road by erecting a temporary
cattle shed and this compelled the plaintiffs herein to
knock the doors ... recorded a categorical finding that the
existence of the alleged suit path is not substantiated by
the plaintiffs. Secondly, the Court held that the cross
