Sabina
Bench: Sabina
RSA-465-2016(O&M) [1]
***
In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh.
RSA ... Rule 10(2) of CCS (CCA) Rules 1965 on the ground that
1 of 6
::: Downloaded on - 01-04-2016 00:04:08 :::
RSA
Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:152694
RSA No.2042
2042 of 2009 (O&M) -2-
defendant
ant was dismissed from service on the allegations ... defendant No.3 informing
him about his misconduct under Rule 3(1) (2) of the CCS Conduct Rules,
1984 stating therein that
Neutral Citation No:=2023:PHHC:004950
RSA-804-2001 (O&M) -5-
as those are to be relied during the enquiry proceedings ... Disciplinary Authority is bound by the
procedure laid down in the CCS (CCA) Rules,
1965 and it cannot side track or ignore. It was
mandatory
stipulates that NCC WTO
pensioners are to be governed by the CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972, and not by
the Army Pension Code and as such ... Pension Rules is legally untenable
and liable to be rejected.
(10). It is further submitted that even under the applicable CCS
(Pension) Rules
Bench: Sudeepti Sharma
RSA-3922-2025 (O&M) -1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
RSA ... illegal, against
facts, against law, against the provisions of CCS Pensions Regulation,
against service rules and that he is entitled to get the disability
pension
State Of Punjab And Others vs Mehar Singh on 7 January, 2009
Bench: Satish Kumar
notice of retirement under
Rule 40 (1) of the CCS (Pension) Rules 1972, read with Rule 102
of the BSF Rules, 1969, served by Shri Nirmal ... Rule
30(b) of BSF Rules, 1969 (hereinafter to be referred as 1969 Rules).
Rule 30 of the Border Security Force Rules, 1969, which deals
said widow is entitled to family
pension as per Rule 54 of CCS Pension Rules and there is nothing on
record to show that Didar ... widow who is
entitled 100% family pension as per Rule 54 of CCS
Pension Rules and as per record of the deceased the
benefits
Sarbans Singh And Ors vs State Of Haryana And Ors on 25 March, 2025
Author
(O&M;) S K Jain vs Puran Chand And Ors on 18 July, 2017
