voice analysis
lab regarding CD filed by the complainant (respondent No.2) with her
complaint opined tat in the CD the voice in question marked ... petitioner Vikram Singh from her and the
CD, transcript of which is on record contains the probable voice of both
petitioners as per the Forensic
aforesaid application, the respondent has only sought permission to take the
CD and transcript of conversation on record. At this stage, the Court has taken
aforesaid application, the respondent has only sought permission to take the
CD and transcript of conversation on record. At this stage, the Court has taken
Order 7 Rule 14(3) of the CPC for taking
the CD and transcript in respect of conversation of respondent with other
women on record
CD
between the complainant and present petitioner. Even the Enquiry Officer
has discarded the said CD and also observed that even the transcript
produced in the form of CD has been discarded by the
Special Judge but on the basis of transcript of the conversation the
appellant
file in CD could
not be proved for want of certificate under section 65-B of
the Evidence Act but the transcript and from
submit another
written complaint to the Superintendent of Police EPS. The transcript
of the said conversation was prepared and FIR was registered as
Crime ... again kept in the
- : 3 :-
CRA No.7524/2019
sealed cover. CD was prepared and it was kept along with certificate
under Section
