surveillance kept on the mobile phone used by him.
(viii) The transcript of the conversations given in the pen drive
purportedly ... transcripts in his computer on 24th January 2008, i.e. after 2 months
and 22 days. The voice samples along with the said CD
surveillance kept on the mobile phone used by him.
(viii) The transcript of the conversations given in the pen drive
purportedly ... transcripts in his computer on 24th January 2008, i.e. after 2 months
and 22 days. The voice samples along with the said CD
surveillance kept on the mobile phone used by him.
(viii) The transcript of the conversations given in the pen drive
purportedly ... transcripts in his computer on 24th January 2008, i.e. after 2 months
and 22 days. The voice samples along with the said CD
CD containing the video of
the sting operation in the presence of the Committee. The Petitioner, however,
declined the offer. He maintained that the CD ... violation of the PNDT Act. A perusal of the transcript of the
CD, which has been placed on record by the Petitioner along with
sample voice of PW12 and compare it with the voice on the CD
prepared by the Junior Forensic Examiner, FSL. The voice of the deceased ... conversations in the CD do not appear to have been put to any of the
PWs. No transcript of the conversations appears to have been
stated in the TV sound-bite recording available on the CD (Ex.P1).
(viii) The trial Court then considered the circumstance of Karunesh ... Ashwani Raturi (PW17) had
established that Karunesh had called No.100. The transcript of the said call
was exhibited as Ex.PW17/H. Even
Dharambir Khattar vs Central Bureau Of Investigation on 5 May, 2009
Author: S. Muralidhar
Bench
Dharambir vs Central Bureau Of Investigation [Along ... on 11 March, 2008
Equivalent citations: 148(2008
