complainant were not
produced and the alleged conversation in the CD and transcript were
not properly proved and therefore, the same cannot be looked into
alteration
in the CD containing the conversation and as Transcript of said CD
clearly show the incriminating material as against the accused. It is
also ... alteration in the
CD containing the conversation and as Transcript of said CD clearly
show the incriminating material as against the accused. It is also
complainant.
17. Further investigation revealed that complainant, as per the CD /
manual transcript prepared in Hindi of the conversation of petitioner Sarat
Chander
further added by Ld. Addl. PP that the CD and the
transcriptions were duly proved by the prosecution and there is no
reason to keep ... Seizure Memo relating to CD
Ex.PW1/F and Ex.PW1/G, Transcription between the complainant
and accused Ajit Singh
mobile chip
and Ex.DW4/D, CD, and transcripts of the entire
conversation, Ex.DW4/F (Collectively). DW5 was not
cross-examined
CD containing the conversation between him and
the accused but as said CD was not sent to FSL for examination by
the IO, said CD ... Memo of
CD Ex.PW4/B, it is reflected that the complainant has delivered CD
Mark A1 and copy of said CD Mark
State vs . 1. Balbir Singh on 29 October, 2013
IN THE COURT OF SHRI B
CD of video recording, a CD of
audio recording and a CD containing still photographs. He also annexed
a copy of the transcripts of video ... against him. Referring to the CD
State Vs. Chandbeer Page 6 of 17
7
Ex. PX1 and the transcripts
Cbi vs . Sushanta Mukherjee & Ors. Page No. 1 Of ... on 7 September, 2013
-1
Criminal Appeal No. 689/2013 Titled As ... vs . State Of on 21 August, 2013
IN