stated that P.W.1 had brought the
recorded CD and that was played at the time of pre-trap
mahazar ... from CD produced by P.W.1.
What was the source of recording to CD itself is not
explained and established. Therefore, the transcriptions
which
prosecution. When the primary evidence is not
produced, the alleged conversation and transcriptions
ought not to have been considered by the Trial Court ... conversation has
been reduced to the CD and it has been converted in the
form of transcriptions, the person who transcribed
tenders for supplying food to
Anganwadis to ineligible entities. The transcript and the
CD of the false and defamatory statements made by the
Plaintiff
compact
disc/Ex.R3 and Ex.R8 is the transcription of the statement
given by RW.2. Apparently ... 2015
produced. Ex.R4 was relied to say that CD was genuine one.
Ex.R4 is not a certificate, it is only
compact
disc/Ex.R3 and Ex.R8 is the transcription of the statement
given by RW.2. Apparently ... 2015
produced. Ex.R4 was relied to say that CD was genuine one.
Ex.R4 is not a certificate, it is only
CD) is also produced and marked as Ex.D15 and
Ex.D.16). The said conversation in Ex.D.15 and its transcription
Aruna Y M vs Teh Criminal Investigating Deparment ... on 7 February, 2025
Author: M.Nagaprasanna
Sri. B. S. Yeddyurappa vs The Criminal Investigating Department ... on 7 February, 2025
Author: M
