Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 103 (1.84 seconds)

Ramprasad Vishwanath Gupta vs Tanaji Bhausaheb Desai Adn Ors on 19 March, 2024

PRESSURE TACTICS / MANIPULATION BY ACCUSED PERSONS...........553 vii. CALL DETAIL RECORDS (`CDR')..............................................................607 a. Law vis-a-vis CDR.......................................................................................608 b. Evidence of nodal ... only in the form of Call Detail Records/Subscriber Detail Records (CDR/SDR), which, by itself, is not sufficient to point to the complicity
Bombay High Court Cites 167 - Cited by 0 - R M Dere - Full Document

Prakash Ganpat Kadam vs The State Of Maharashtra on 19 March, 2024

PRESSURE TACTICS / MANIPULATION BY ACCUSED PERSONS...........553 vii. CALL DETAIL RECORDS (`CDR')..............................................................607 a. Law vis-a-vis CDR.......................................................................................608 b. Evidence of nodal ... only in the form of Call Detail Records/Subscriber Detail Records (CDR/SDR), which, by itself, is not sufficient to point to the complicity
Bombay High Court Cites 167 - Cited by 0 - R M Dere - Full Document

Vinayak Babasaheb Shinde @ Veenu vs The State Of Maharashtra on 19 March, 2024

PRESSURE TACTICS / MANIPULATION BY ACCUSED PERSONS...........553 vii. CALL DETAIL RECORDS (`CDR')..............................................................607 a. Law vis-a-vis CDR.......................................................................................608 b. Evidence of nodal ... only in the form of Call Detail Records/Subscriber Detail Records (CDR/SDR), which, by itself, is not sufficient to point to the complicity
Bombay High Court Cites 167 - Cited by 0 - R M Dere - Full Document

Sandip S/O Hemraj Sardar (Prisoner) vs The State Of Maharashtra on 19 March, 2024

PRESSURE TACTICS / MANIPULATION BY ACCUSED PERSONS...........553 vii. CALL DETAIL RECORDS (`CDR')..............................................................607 a. Law vis-a-vis CDR.......................................................................................608 b. Evidence of nodal ... only in the form of Call Detail Records/Subscriber Detail Records (CDR/SDR), which, by itself, is not sufficient to point to the complicity
Bombay High Court Cites 167 - Cited by 0 - R M Dere - Full Document

Pradeep Pandurang Suryawanshi vs The State Of Maharashtra on 19 March, 2024

PRESSURE TACTICS / MANIPULATION BY ACCUSED PERSONS...........553 vii. CALL DETAIL RECORDS (`CDR')..............................................................607 a. Law vis-a-vis CDR.......................................................................................608 b. Evidence of nodal ... only in the form of Call Detail Records/Subscriber Detail Records (CDR/SDR), which, by itself, is not sufficient to point to the complicity
Bombay High Court Cites 167 - Cited by 0 - R M Dere - Full Document

Tanaji Bhausaheb Desai vs The State Of Maharashtra And Anr on 19 March, 2024

PRESSURE TACTICS / MANIPULATION BY ACCUSED PERSONS...........553 vii. CALL DETAIL RECORDS (`CDR')..............................................................607 a. Law vis-a-vis CDR.......................................................................................608 b. Evidence of nodal ... only in the form of Call Detail Records/Subscriber Detail Records (CDR/SDR), which, by itself, is not sufficient to point to the complicity
Bombay High Court Cites 167 - Cited by 0 - R M Dere - Full Document

The State Of Maharashtra vs Pradeep Rameshwar Sharma on 19 March, 2024

PRESSURE TACTICS / MANIPULATION BY ACCUSED PERSONS...........553 vii. CALL DETAIL RECORDS (`CDR')..............................................................607 a. Law vis-a-vis CDR.......................................................................................608 b. Evidence of nodal ... only in the form of Call Detail Records/Subscriber Detail Records (CDR/SDR), which, by itself, is not sufficient to point to the complicity
Bombay High Court Cites 167 - Cited by 0 - R M Dere - Full Document

Anand Balaji Patade vs The State Of Maharashtra on 19 March, 2024

PRESSURE TACTICS / MANIPULATION BY ACCUSED PERSONS...........553 vii. CALL DETAIL RECORDS (`CDR')..............................................................607 a. Law vis-a-vis CDR.......................................................................................608 b. Evidence of nodal ... only in the form of Call Detail Records/Subscriber Detail Records (CDR/SDR), which, by itself, is not sufficient to point to the complicity
Bombay High Court Cites 167 - Cited by 0 - R M Dere - Full Document

Nitin Gorakhnath Sartape vs The State Of Maharashtra on 19 March, 2024

PRESSURE TACTICS / MANIPULATION BY ACCUSED PERSONS...........553 vii. CALL DETAIL RECORDS (`CDR')..............................................................607 a. Law vis-a-vis CDR.......................................................................................608 b. Evidence of nodal ... only in the form of Call Detail Records/Subscriber Detail Records (CDR/SDR), which, by itself, is not sufficient to point to the complicity
Bombay High Court Cites 167 - Cited by 0 - R M Dere - Full Document

Dilip Sitaram Palande vs The State Of Maharashtra on 19 March, 2024

PRESSURE TACTICS / MANIPULATION BY ACCUSED PERSONS...........553 vii. CALL DETAIL RECORDS (`CDR')..............................................................607 a. Law vis-a-vis CDR.......................................................................................608 b. Evidence of nodal ... only in the form of Call Detail Records/Subscriber Detail Records (CDR/SDR), which, by itself, is not sufficient to point to the complicity
Bombay High Court Cites 167 - Cited by 0 - R M Dere - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next