Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 72 (0.84 seconds)

State vs . 1. Ashok Nagar on 21 December, 2019

Officer, Vodafone Mobile Services Ltd has proved the record ie CAF, CDR Cell ID Chart and Election ID pertaining to mobile No.8860098480 ... Reliance Communication Ltd that he has proved the record ie CAF, CDR Cell ID Chart and Election ID of mobile No.9015819370 for the period
Delhi District Court Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs . (1) Raju on 3 February, 2023

accused Raju. The deposition of PW-1 is contradicted by the CDR and Cell Id Chart on three accounts. Firstly, PW-1 said deceased left ... also appears to the reason why prosecution did not get the CDR and Cell ID location of mobile number 7532863401 proved on the record
Delhi District Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs 1. Lokesh @ Lucky on 4 December, 2018

subscribed to Rajpal Singh S/o. Patram.   He proved the CDRCell Location as well as certificate u/s. 65­B of Indian Evidence ... subscribed to Mr. Babadur Singh S/o. Ram Dass.  He proved the CDR and certificate  u/s. 65 ­B of Indian Evidence
Delhi District Court Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Ram Tej vs State on 18 May, 2023

Nodal Officer at Idea Cellular who brought the CDR (Ex.PW-28/C) pertaining to mobile No.7836944656 which was in the name of Bansidhar ... Nodal Officer at Vodafone Mobile Services, who brought the CDR and the Cell ID chart (Ex.PW-30/B and Ex.PW-30/D respectively
Delhi High Court Cites 24 - Cited by 0 - M Gupta - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next