between 4.00 P.M. to 7.00 P.M. on 22.12.2024 further Cell tower location of
Mobile No.9966492793 of accused Seshaiah between ... dated- 23.12.2024. 8).Cell tower location data of Mobile No.9618462988
belongs to defacto-complainant Sravani on dated
Unnao City Office, which
fact is captured by the cell tower located at Civil Lines, Unnao,
which is at a distance of 300 meters from ... other day, apart
from 04.06.2017.
(x) Even otherwise, accuracy of cell tower locations and the evidence
obtained as a result, is not completely reliable because
accused no.
3 and indicating their close proximity based on cell tower location
data. He also referred to the statements of various witnesses, including ... shown to be in close proximity to
him based on cell tower location data. Additionally, he placed reliance
on the statements of various witnesses earlier
plazas outside Delhi, as well as his mobile‟s CDR and cell tower
location. Regarding the second alleged incident on 19.08.2024, it is
pointed ... that the CDR and cell tower locations of both the
petitioner and the prosecutrix do not match. Furthermore, it is
contended that during the entire
biased
investigation and crucial electronic evidence such as call details/cell tower
location, whats app messages and facebook history of the victim and the
accused ... copy of the customer application form
(CAF), call details record (CDR), Cell Tower Location (CTL), whatsapp messages
and facebook history of mobile numbers
mobile connection bearing
no.9247733323 from the opposite parties,
but the cell tower located in the village Satyavaram, to which he belongs, was not functioning ... village but not a Cell Tower and that the Repeater Station relays signals which emanated from the cell tower located in the town Tuni
Objector has also submitted that the call details
record and the cell tower location go to reveal that the
numbers of the deceased
time i.e. at 3:28 PM, the tower location of both these cell numbers
was the same and thereafter, no call was made ... Gurdaspur. The learned trial Court
on the basis of tower location record of all these cell phone numbers had
observed that location of appellant
examination and has discharged
the accused on the basis of different cell tower locations of the accused and
the prosecutrix during the relevant time
prosecutrix. Furthermore, the trial court has
rightly observed that the cell tower locations are not conclusive proof of
anybody's presence or absence
