sentence of reappointment was substituted with the punishment of Censure. Thereafter, Censure entry was not challenged before any Tribunal or Courts. Under these circumstances ... affected merely by awarding Censure entry irrespective of the fact that the entry of Censure was substituted from the earlier order of reappointment that
dated 25.08.2007 and 30.08.2007 of Censure entry, applicant will not get any benefit by quashing these orders of Censure entry. It is alleged that ... order dated 30.08.2007, and perusal of the order shows that the Censure entry was recorded in the case of the applicant. No major punishment
Works Department, Anubhag -VI, U.P., Lucknow, whereby a penalty of Censure Entry and a recovery ... impugned order dated 28-08-2002 the petitioner was awarded Censure Entry and recovery of 75% Rs. 13,000/- i.e. Rs. 9750/-.
The counsel
reply, the disciplinary authority decided to impose a penalty of Censure Entry on him. Thereafter, on 11.6.2008, the entire record was submitted to the UPSC ... levelled against the applicant were partly proved and therefore, proposed a Censure entry and sent the entire record to the UPSC for obtaining its advice
petitioner and the fact that he has been awarded censure entry and minor punishment on various occasions, as alleged in counter affidavit, also cannot constitute
August, 1983 fine was imposed, on 27th June, 1984 adverse entry was awarded for the year 1983-84, on 5th June, 1985 warning was given ... fine was imposed, on 21st March, 1986 warning was awarded, censure entry was awarded for the year
order dated 22.10.2011 by which the petitioner has been given censure entry. This order has been passed in pursuance of the show cause notice dated
from counter affidavit it appears that only two entries basically have been considered, one 'censure' recorded on 21.11.2002 and another 'warning ... required to be complied with and even adverse entries made in the confidential record including uncommunicated entries may be taken into consideration but the same
pressure, the matter regarding compulsory retirement be considered alongwith annual entries of past ten years.
The marks which were to be assigned to various punishments ... under:
(1) For every warning - 5 marks
(2) For every censure entry - 10 marks
(3) For every increment withheld with non-cumulative effect - 10 marks
18th February, 2002, the claimant-respondent no. 1 was punished with censure entry, which is the subject matter of dispute before the Tribunal.
The Tribunal
