said OA,
the disciplinary proceedings culminated into imposition of penalty of
„Censure‟. The applicant accordingly challenged the penalty of
Censure in a separate ... sheet dated
10.09.2012. Subsequently, OA No.2837/2013 wherein the penalty of
Censure was challenged came to be disposed of vide order dated
11.12.2013 with
Model Conduct, discipline and Appeal Rules, an appeal against the censure entry/adverse entry were preferred on 8.4.2014 by respondent no. 1 after three ... petitioner that there is no provision of representation against the punishment of censure entry imposed under Rule 34 of the above Rules. There is however
Inquiry Officer, this Court has been pleased to incorporate the censure entry in the character roll of the petitioner regarding acquittal of accused Mohd. Ayub ... reasons".
12. According to the learned Counsel for the petitioner despite censure entry having been recorded in his character roll, he was promoted
Assistant Sub Inspector on 04.06.1996.
The respondent was given punishment of censure on 30.09.1977
on account of disobeying the higher authorities. Again the
punishment ... censure was given on 15.12.1982 for improper
entries in the diary. The third punishment of censure was given on
21.12.1983, the necessary information regarding
petition.
2. There is a striking distinction between the minor penalty of
Censure for reasons other than doubting integrity of an employee and one
which ... integrity doubted. If the basis of award of minor
punishment of Censure relates to a charge of corruption and the integrity
above lapse, one officer may
merely award him a “Censure” taking a lenient view
while another officer may impose the punishment of
“stoppage of increment ... check period' that is one year in the case of censure and five
years in the case of other minor punishments is illegal
came to his house and met him, and a punishment of "Censure" was
given to him on 19.10.2012 in No.5857 ... School and District Prison, Pudukkottai.
4. The petitioner would submits that "Censure" is not a punishment and
on the basis, promotion cannot
thereafter preferred statutory appeals against the said
punishment, which ended in 'censure'. However, the names of the
petitioners, inspite of the same ... panel
year 2017-2018 on the ground that the aforesaid 'censure' has a check
period of one year which falls on the crucial
that for the purpose of
grant of selection grade, the penalty of censure will not be taken
into consideration and as out of six penalties ... imposed 5 are of
censure, therefore, the communications dated 22.8.2001 as well
as 18.9.2001 (Annex.P/3 and Annex.P/4 respectively) are contrary
issued by
respondent No. 4 by which the punishment of censure was awarded
to him.
2. The facts as projected in this petition, briefly ... petitioner as correct and on the
other hand, imposed the punishment of censure upon him. It is
submitted that the said Final Order is self
