averred that
there was a history of Plaintiff undergoing cesarean section on
01.07.2009 following which the Plaintiff was leaking urine from
her vagina ... suffering from ureterovaginal fistula left side as a
complication of cesarean section which the Plaintiff had
undergone on 01.07.2009. It is stated that Dr. Sunil
State vs Reeta Devi on 16 December, 2023
IN THE COURT OF MS. AMBIKA SINGH
complainant delivered a baby girl named
Zia, by the cesarean section in Holy Family
Hospital, New Delhi. Because of the mental
stress and tension caused
result of disseminated intravascular coagulation consequent
upon lower segment cesarean section which was performed by
Dr.Nepash Kacker under the guidance of Dr.Lily Dahiya
result of disseminated intravascular coagulation consequent
upon lower segment cesarean section. Admittedly the C-Section
was not performed by Dr.Sonal Dahiya
hospital. On the basis of said statement, FIR No.
208/14 under Sec. 323 / 452 / 313 / 34 IPC was registered at PS Khajuri Khas.
During investigation ... born before time approximate 34-36 weeks and by lower segment cesarean
section in view of transverse lie and placenta previa with continued bleeding
registered only on an order passed by such Court in an
application u/s 156 (3) Cr.P.C.
Raj Kishore Goel vs. The State ... respondents, revisionist
and his wife agreed to undergo delivery by cesarean section
surgery at the nursing home of the respondents i.e. Shivani
Maternity
Court did not even examine the petitioner after
dismissal of application under section 156(3) Cr.P.C. It is stated
that impugned order ... normal delivery but the
patient did not progress; patient was advised cesarean section in
view of poor prognosis of labor pain, the necessity of cesarean
that according to PW1, her son was born
on 24.01.2006 by Cesarean Section and Rs. 50,000/ was spent in the
surgery and this expense
plaintiff was diagnosed with 'Pre-eclampsia
D6 Lower Segment Cesarean Section' characterised by
high blood pressure.
3. Defendant no.2 was duly served
