Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 38 (0.03 seconds)

Surjibhai Badaji Kalasva-On Behalf Of ... vs State Of Gujarat on 30 January, 2018

ripe.  C) Abnormal Urerine action. D) Higher incidence of cesarean section.  E) Higher incidence of maternal infection.  F) Amniotic Fluid Embolism.  3) As the pregnancy ... ripe.  C) Abnormal Urerine action. D) Higher incidence of cesarean section.  E) Higher incidence of maternal infection.  F) Amniotic Fluid Embolism.  Page
Gujarat High Court Cites 35 - Cited by 1 - J B Pardiwala - Full Document

Dr. Jose Joseph & Anr. vs C.S. Raju & Ors. on 11 January, 2018

maternal and foetal outcome.   1.      This first appeal has been filed under Section 19 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 against the order dated ... surgical removal of pregnant uterus alone or with the cervix during cesarean section (cesarean hysterectomy) or shortly following vaginal delivery (postpartum hysterectomy
National Consumer Disputes Redressal Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

New India Assurance Co. vs Deviner Kumar on 28 March, 2018

Dilation, suggesting obstructed labour which itself was an indication for lower section cesareans sections (LSCS). She was having hemoglobin of 4.5 gram, but, her attendants ... complication. It was nowhere mentioned in the record of PGI Chandigarh that cesarean procedure was wrongly performed. It was simply mentioned that cause of death
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 0 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 Next