CGIT, the petitioners herein
who were deprived by the CGIT of reinstatement and
19
consequential benefits did not implead themselves or
challenge the award ... dispute that 21 workmen
21
approached the CGIT on 02.08.1989 and the CGIT passed
an award of reinstatement of 14 workmen and
consequential service benefits
learned counsel for the respondents submits
that the CGIT passed an award on 01.04.2013 answering
the points of dispute in favour of the Union ... taking note of
the accepted principles for considering challenges against the
award by CGIT. The Industrial Disputes Act provides the
adjudicatory mechanism for considering disputes
Narayana Swamy,
learned counsel for the respondent would justify the award
of the CGIT dated 07.02.2014 and also the order dated
04.10.2018 passed ... CGIT in favour of the employee.
If such being the conclusion of the CGIT, the learned
Single Judge has rightly upheld the award.
17. Insofar
kind was the Member Secretary and not
the Director. The CGIT awarded 80% back-wages. Neither
the workman is happy nor the Management, with ... disposed off with the following directions:
[i] The impugned award of the CGIT stands
modified to the effect that the workman shall be paid back
kind was the Member Secretary and not
the Director. The CGIT awarded 80% back-wages. Neither
the workman is happy nor the Management, with ... disposed off with the following directions:
[i] The impugned award of the CGIT stands
modified to the effect that the workman shall be paid back
petition filed by the petitioner in
reference vide CR.NO.CGIT/LC/BNG/AWARD/2019 by
accepting the entire reference as per Annexure ... above said period.
20. The learned Presiding Officer of CGIT in the impugned
award in paragraph No. 11 has held as under
1991 AND
PERUSE THE SAME. QUASH THE AWARD PASSED BY CGIT,
BANGALORE (ON 24.3.2014 IN CR.NO.72/1991) UNDER THE
ORIGINAL OF ANNEX ... dismissal of service finally came to be
questioned before the CGIT and CGIT has set aside the order of
dismissal and passed an order
Thereafter, the
respondent-management examined four witnesses before
the CGIT. The CGIT, under impugned award dated
19.01.2021, has concluded that the charges leveled against ... respondent-management and
thus rejected the Reference. Challenging the award of the
CGIT as well as the order of dismissal passed by the
respondent
proceedings CR No.120/1999. In terms of the
said award, CGIT held that there exists relationship of master
and servant between the Bank ... perused the records.
18. On going through the impugned award, it is noticed
that the CGIT has concluded that M.Gangadhara was the
employee
proceedings CR No.120/1999. In terms of the
said award, CGIT held that there exists relationship of master
and servant between the Bank ... perused the records.
18. On going through the impugned award, it is noticed
that the CGIT has concluded that M.Gangadhara was the
employee
