Award dated 18 June 2001. LIC submitted its responses before the
CGIT. The CGIT submitted its report on 31 May 2019 28 to this Court ... workmen whose names are mentioned in the certified/original
list of CGIT Award are to be granted relief. An overall
examination of the order dated
CGIT, the petitioners herein
who were deprived by the CGIT of reinstatement and
19
consequential benefits did not implead themselves or
challenge the award ... dispute that 21 workmen
21
approached the CGIT on 02.08.1989 and the CGIT passed
an award of reinstatement of 14 workmen and
consequential service benefits
award
dated 18.07.2007 nor was he paid full wages from the date
of award i.e., 18.07.2007, therefore, he again approached
the CGIT by filing ... wages from the date of order of
reinstatement passed by the CGIT vide award dated
18.07.2007 to the date of actual reinstatement
evidentiary findings contained in paragraphs
16 and 17 of the award of the CGIT (Annexure P-9). We are
inclined to issue notice for this ... citizens.
6 Since the High Court has affirmed the award of the CGIT, we
have been able to arrive at an understanding of the basic
illegal.
11. I, therefore, allow this writ petition. The
impugned Award of CGIT is set aside. The
termination of services of petitioner-workman is
held ... present petition is in respect of implementation
of the CGIT Award in ID No.87/87 titled MJ Prashad v. AGEB&RT, which
Thangammal and Smt. Rajammal. The scope of interference to
an Award of the CGIT or a Labour Court has been consistently dealt
with in various ... stands dismissed;
ii) the Award of the CGIT dated
31.03.2015, insofar as it orders 25% of the back
wages, is modified into one of “full
award without
hearing the arguments and the absence of both the parties was marked on
the date of passing of award. The CGIT ignored ... denied that the petitioner was not informed about
passing of the award. The award was duly published and the petitioner
had information about
Learned CGIT
decided the reference in favour of the petitioner/workman and against
the respondent bank. Learned CGIT in the impugned Award has inter
alia ... awarded compensation in
the sum of Rs. 5 Lakhs to the workman.
24. A perusal of the impugned award passed by the Learned CGIT
indicates
Chief Manager, Punjab and Sind
Bank. By the impugned Award, the CGIT held that the punishment of
compulsory retirement imposed on the Respondent/Workman (hereinafter ... Bank.
16. After perusing the evidence placed on record, the CGIT passed the
impugned Award dated 9th October, 2019, extracted hereinabove, and set
aside
entitled to"
4. The reference was adjudicated by the learned CGIT vide Award
dated 29th February, 2016 in the ID Case No. 192/2011 ... Shrinagar, Haridwar etc. as the
management thinks fit. An award is accordingly passed. Let
this award be sent to the appropriate Government, as required
under
