Mother in respect of the said property.
However, plaintiff has never challenged the mutation order nor
sought any restraint regarding exercise of bhumidhari right ... Section 11 being
not maintainable for the reason of mutation and mutation
having not been challenged. I am unable to find any
illegality requiring interference
filed two revision petitions on 25.07.2005 before the
Joint Financial Commissioner, challenging mutation nos. 164 and 192 of village
Nagabal, Ganderbal, attested by Naib Tehsildar ... pleadings made by them in para 8 of the
revision petition challenging mutation no.164 dated 14.08.1993 and in para 10 of
the revision petition
wrong and illegal.
Significantly, Mukti Nath @ Mohan Lal Sharma
.
did not challenge mutation No.136, which was attested in
favour of Kamla Devi and Suresh ... Mohan Lal Sharma, presumed
dead, surfaced from oblivion in 1994 and challenged the
mutation of inheritance in favour of his son Suresh Kumar
(defendant
title is under threat.
38. The father of plaintiffs never challenged mutation in
favour of defendant no. 1 during his life time. Other two sons ... also did not challenge
mutation in favour of defendant no. 1. Said mutation is challenged by
grandsons of late Shri Subh Ram. However
mutated in favour of Smt. Sita Singh on
15.10.1965 in the revenue record. The said sale deed and mutation order
dated 15.10.1965 was never challenged ... also challenging the mutation order by which the land in
question was mutated in favour of Smt. Sita Singh and also challenged
the mutation order
given effect at any point of
time. That Petitioners did not challenge Mutation Entry No.3342
cancelled on 16 October 1972, which had the effect ... given effect in the revenue
records, it was necessary to first challenge Mutation Entry No.3342.
The DDLR has stopped at this stage
filed on 18th
2/29
wp10972-23
July, 1976, the Appellants challenged the Mutation Entry No.912
dated 14th June, 1963 and Mutation Entry ... legal heirs were required to be mutated and by the mutation
entry under challenge only the name of the Respondent No.1-
8/29
wp10972
recorded perverse
finding, that the mutation entries mutating the names of Daji Vernekar
and Laku Vernekar have been challenged where in fact the said mutation ... appears that two Mutation Entries are
effected as under :
Land Survey No. Mutation Name mutated Capacity in which name
Entry No. mutated
deceased Mst.
Khurshi filed a revision before the Settlement Commissioner
challenging mutation No. 470 of village Natipora contending that
according to the Muslim ... LPAOW no.33/2017
filed a revision before Settlement Commissioner challenging mutation
No.470 of village Natipora, contending that according to Muslim Law
her grandmother
recorded by the Revenue Authorities.
The petitioner has challenged the mutation entries which are taken by the
revenue authorities, based on the documents of unregistered ... challenge the documents in
question. Further, since the documents of partition-deed are not challenged
before any civil Court, mere challenge to the mutation entries
