Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

Court lacks pecuniary jurisdiction. The MOU set up by the plaintiff being champertous agreement was opposed to public policy and Indian law. The challenge ... immoral purpose. Therefore, the contention that Ex.P24 was a champertous agreement is unsustainable. iv) Similarly Ex.P24 and the evidence

purchases made under exhibit J and exhibits G and H were champertous. 153. But, Mr. Venkatesha Iyer did not, very properly, try to justify that

Sri Chikkappa S/O.Lakkappa By Lrs vs Smt Narasamma on 4 June, 2025 Author

have abused the process of court and accused No.1 has instituted champertous proceedings in the name of the petitioners viz. Accused