Gollapudi Seshayya vs Nadendla Subbayya And Anr. on 23 April, 1924
been held that in this country champerty is not necessarily opposed to public policy; and in considering whether champertous agreements should be set aside
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 2 of 2 (0.78 seconds)Vatsavaya Venkata Subhadrayamma vs Poosapati Venkatapati on 5 May, 1924
might never leave him anything whatever. In India, of course, champerty or maintenance is not illegal. In Glegg v Bromley ... purchase an interest in such fruits because of the doctrine of champerty.
36. In their Lordships' view the agreement embodied in paragraph
1