Ratanchand Hirachand vs Askar Nawaz Jung And Ors. on 18 March, 1975
Nagi Reddy, AIR 1962 Andh Pra 457. Both were cases of champerty. Both were cases where the agreements wee held to the extortionate and unconscionable
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 7 of 7 (0.58 seconds)United India Fire And General Insurance ... vs Pelaniappa Transport Carriers And Anr. on 21 March, 1985
will not recognise any transaction which may savour of maintenance of champerty. It is only when there is some interest in the subject matter that
M/S. Trinity Infraventures Limited, ... vs The State Of Telangana, Represented By ... on 16 August, 2018
M/S. Trinity Infraventures Limited, ... vs The State Of Telangana, Represented By ... on 16 August
Mc. Dowell And Co., Ltd., Visakhapatnam vs District Registrar, Visakhapatnam on 16 March, 2000
will not recognise any transaction which may savour of maintenance of champerty, ft is only when there is some interest in the subject matter that
V.T.V. Rangacharyulu And Anr. vs Sriram Gnaneswar on 1 December, 1975
prior fraudulent conveyance, or the ground of an agreement in champerty, will no longer be available to the suit and appeal; they are irretrievably decided
Khaja Moinuddin Khan And Others vs S.P. Ranga Rao And Others on 1 October, 1999
said judgment held as follows:
"With respect to the paw of champerty or maintenance, it must be admitted, and indeed it is admitted ... same as it is in England. The statute of champerty, being part of the statute law of England, has of course no effect
Zainab Begum Alias Varalakshmi vs Khursheed Begum And Ors. on 16 February, 1962
long line of authority that the English law in regard to champerty and maintenance does not apply in India. A fair agreement to supply funds
1