Tribunal that the agreement in question amounted both to maintenance and champerty and as such it was illegal and that by entering into such ... their opinion even if the agreement did not amount to maintenance and champerty, it constituted professional misconduct.
The learned Government pleader attempted to raise before
Tribunal that the agreement in question amounted both to maintenance and champerty and as such it was Illegal and that by entering into such ... their, opinion even if the agreement did not amount to maintenance and champerty, it constituted professional misconduct.
The learned Government Pleader attempted to raise before
right of action was permissible, and did not savour of champerty or maintenance".
Bankes L. J. took the view that where a right
also of the various High Courts. There is no specific law against champerty in India and although champertous transactions are prohibited in England, such agreements
In Re: An Attorney vs Unknown on 24 June, 1954
Equivalent citations: AIR1955CAL113, 58CWN880
JUDGMENT
legally unobjectionable if no lawyer was involved. The rigid English rules of champerty and maintenance do not apply in India, so if this agreement
legally unobjectionable if no lawyer was involved. The rigid English rules of champerty and maintenance do not apply in India, so if this agreement
