that the said Cheque was
already withdrawn /used by the Petitioner way back in 29.02.2003 and
thereafter, the said Cheque was destroyed by the Bank ... Cheque, that it was utilized for withdrawal of
cash of Rs.500/- by the Petitioner on 29.03.2003 and that the Cheque has
been destroyed
thereon from the
parties thereto. Where the note, bill or cheque is lost or destroyed, its
holder is the person so entitled at the time ... amount due thereon from
the parties thereto. (Where the cheque is lost or destroyed, its
holder is the person so entitled at the time
thereon from the
parties thereto. Where the note, bill or cheque is lost or destroyed, its
holder is the person so entitled at the time ... amount due thereon from
the parties thereto. (Where the cheque is lost or destroyed, its
holder is the person so entitled at the time
thereon from the
parties thereto. Where the note, bill or cheque is lost or destroyed, its
holder is the person so entitled at the time ... amount due thereon from
the parties thereto. (Where the cheque is lost or destroyed, its
holder is the person so entitled at the time
thereon from the
parties thereto. Where the note, bill or cheque is lost or destroyed, its
holder is the person so entitled at the time ... amount due thereon from
the parties thereto. (Where the cheque is lost or destroyed, its
holder is the person so entitled at the time
drawee".--The maker of a bill of exchange or
cheque is called the "drawer", the person thereby directed to pay
is called ... thereon from the parties thereto.
Where the note, bill or cheque is lost or destroyed, its holder
is the person so entitled at the time
observed:
"4. A cheque is under the law a negotiable Instrument. Its
negotiability can be destroyed only if it is marked ... face; it is not destroyed by its simply being
crossed whether generally or specially. The only effect of crossing a
cheque is, as stated
defined in section 7 of the Act. The maker of the cheque is called the "drawer" and the "person" thereby directed ... thereon from the parties thereto. Where the note, bill or cheque is lost or destroyed its holder is the person so entitled at the time
undocumented payments upfront. The submission of Mr. Chawla is that the
cheque of US$250,000 was issued in the aforesaid background. On
23.09.2007, defendant ... asked the plaintiff to either mail back the cheque to
him or destroy and send a mail to that effect to defendant
Geeta Gupta, he refused to do anything further and
destroyed all ATM Cards and cheque books of the accounts which were
opened
