cheque of Rs. 1,00,000/- from the bank and destroyed the said cheque..........
3.4 The petitioner says and submits that, after receiving the aforesaid ... when the concerned clerk went down, the petitioner stole that cheque No. 78725 and
destroyed it. As a matter of fact, no one had come
lost the cheque-book as a result
the bank has returned the cheque of the complainant with a
remark "Cheque Destroyed
requested for issuance of new cheque,
but did not produce any material to show that the cheque got destroyed, so
new cheque was not issued ... Clinic Infratech (P) Ltd.
Issuance of cheque is admitted by the defendant. Plaintiff alleged that the
cheque was destroyed by the machine of bank which
deceased on blank cheque leaves. An
amount of Rs.90,000/- was entered in a cheque and the
said cheque was tried to be encashed ... accused
themselves volunteered to show the place where they
had destroyed the cheque leaves and had burnt the
cheque book and other articles belonging
which the petitioner is one of the partners and
thereafter cheque was destroyed with intent to screen the
Patna High Court ... evidence of forgery in the cheque.
Learned counsel for the CBI opposed the
prayer for bail.
Considering the aforesaid facts, let the
petitioner, above named
that
due to overwriting by his staff, he has destroyed the
said cheque and believing him he paid the amount to
him in cash ... cheque in dispute to him, on the pretext that, due to
overwriting by his staff on the said cheque, the same
had been destroyed
date of accident on 14.01.2016 at
2.00 p.m. Along with the cheque, some auspicious documents
were also burned. This Court already permitted the complainant ... seen in the
Ex.P-7 document. The four corners of cheque are destroyed
due to the fire accident. Therefore, the said document
asked the complainant for return of the cheque
but he was assured that the same has been destroyed. He was cross-
examined by Ld. Counsel ... relied upon the
contention of the complainant that he had destroyed the cheque. If the
complainant had refused to return the cheque, the accused should
asked the complainant for return of the
cheque but he was assured that the same has been destroyed. He was
cross-examined by Ld. Counsel ... relied upon the
contention of the complainant that he had destroyed the cheque. If the
complainant had refused to return the cheque, the accused should
asked the complainant for return of the
cheque but he was assured that the same has been destroyed. He was
cross-examined by Ld. Counsel ... relied upon the
contention of the complainant that he had destroyed the cheque. If the
complainant had refused to return the cheque, the accused should
