City and Industrial Development Corporation of Maharashtra (herein after referred to as CIDCO) owned land in Nerul Mumbai over which Focus Trading Pvt. Ltd. accused ... possession of the building without reference to any plot. On enquiry from CIDCO the complainant came to know that Focus Trading Pvt. Ltd. had surrendered
judgments of the Apex Court in Star Enterprises and Ors. v. CIDCO Maharashtra, Food Corporation of India v. Kamdhenu Cattle Feed Industries , Union of India
alter their position to their prejudice, it was not open to CIDCO to take a unilateral decision to cancel the allotment on the ground that
International v. Export Credit Guarantee Corporation of India , Popcorn Entertainment v. CIDCO , Hirday Narain v. ITO , Bareilly and , The C & A General
earmarked as a green belt. It is the stand of the CIDCO that lower level tree plantation has already been done and the balance work
Federation Of Noida Residents Welfare ... vs Noida Toll Bridge Company Ltd. And ... on 26 October
issued by the City Industrial Development Corporation (for short, the 'CIDCO'). Earlier the CIDCO had issued an advertisement for the plots
