Cipla Ltd vs Commissioner Of Customs (Export), ... on 24 December, 2013
IN THE CUSTOMS, EXCISE & SERVICE TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
WEST ZONAL BENCH AT MUMBAI ... circulated to the Departmental : Yes
authorities?
======================================================
M/s Cipla Ltd.
Appellant
Vs.
Commissioner of Customs (Export), Nhava Sheva
Respondent
Appearance:
Shri Brijesh Pathak
Advocate
applicable.
12.3. In the case of Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. Vs. CCE, Vadodara [2003(157) ELT 344 (Tri. Del.)], an amount ... dispute is also entirely different.
12.4. In the case of CIPLA Ltd. Vs. CCE, Bangalore [2002(143) ELT 202 (Tri. Bang.)] also, the issue related
Vs. Union of India : 1994 (74) ELT 795 (Del.) ;(iv)ShahnazAyurvedics Vs. CCEx., Noida : 2004 (173) ELT 337 (All.) ;(v)Sumeet Industries Ltd. Vs. CCEx ... Vs. CCEx., New Delhi : 2008 (232) ELT 272 (Tri.-Del.) ; (viii) Cipla Ltd. Vs. CCEx., Mumbai II : 2006 (205) ELT 652 (Tri.-Mumbai
arise at all. On a similar matter, in the case of Cipla Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Central Excise 2013 (295) ELT 696, this Tribunal
ruling of the Karnataka High Court in the case of CCE, Bangalore Vs. Mahavir Generics 2010 (17) STR 225 (Kar). In this case, the facts ... service of receiving, storing and distributing the goods manufactured by M/s Cipla Ltd., whether the Honble CESTAT, Bangalore is right in holding that
Central Excise, Noida).
M/s Videocon TV Manufacturer (P) Ltd., Appellants
Vs.
CCE, Noida Respondent
Appearance: Ms. Rashi, Advocate for the appellant
Shri ... Division Bench of the Punjab & Haryana High Court in CCE, Panchkula vs. Kulcip Medicines
Commissioner of Central Excise, Chandigarh)
Vascon Engineering Pvt. Ltd. Appellant
Vs.
CCE, Chandigarh Respondent
Appearance:
Shri Prasad Paranjape, Advocate & - for the appellant
Ms. Rajeshwari ... passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Chandigarh]
CCE, Chandigarh Appellant
Vs.
M/s Vascon Engineers Pvt. Ltd. Respondent
Appearance:
Shri Amresh Jain
circulated to the Departmental authorities?
M/s. Glaxo Smithkline Pharmaceuticals Ltd. Appellant
Vs.
Commissioner of Central Excise, Respondent
Chandigarh-I
Appearance:
Shri R.G. Seth ... addition, penalty of Rs.25 lakh was imposed on M/s. Cipla Ltd., Mumbai under Rule 26 read with Rule 209A . The said demands were
