discretion of the Court concerned and the same can not be circumcised by passing any order in this regard. Suffice is to say that since
forming sexual intercourse. The male organ of the appellant was not circumcised and the doctor also noticed smegma inside the penetration. The underwear
authority of the Authority and Adjudicating Offcer is not in any
manner circumcised or barred as a consequence of non
registration of a Real Estate
Puthiyapura Sheik Koya Thangal vs P.P. Koyammakoya on 6 July, 1998
IN THE HIGH
The State Of Maharashtra vs Santosh Vishnu Lonkar And Others on 17 October, 2019
Equivalent
Sabhajeet Maurya vs State Nct Of Delhi on 26 November, 2020
Author: Vibhu Bakhru
Bench
cutting
weapon. On the basis of examination of the body because of
circumcision of the private part, it was reported to be that
that if the yardstick as stated in the impugned notice is adopted, circumcision, piercing of ears / nose, tonsuring etc., of children by parents are illegal
back of saercum.
11. Penis circumcises."
10. These injuries are in the nature of abrasions and contusions. If the statement of the respondents
negative the possibility of recent complete penetration. If the accused is not circumcised, the existence of smegma round the corona gland is proof against penetration