Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 37 (0.59 seconds)

Mohd. Ashfaq vs Kaba Hospital on 11 August, 2011

towards medical negligence for not exercising reasonable care and skill while conducting circumcision operation.         2) The case of the complainant in brief is that ... days old he was taken to the opposite party hospital for circumcision operation. Accordingly Ops 2 & 3 after collecting
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Future Generali India Insurance Co. ... vs 1. Yashaan Chopra on 5 June, 2013

similar infection, three weeks earlier, but, at that time, he had refused circumcision. It was further stated that the complainant was suffering from Phymosis ... written catheterization failed because of swollen/tight foreskin. Hence, admitted for emergency circumcision and catheterization. Under the heading investigations requested/advised it was written
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Suma Sarasan vs Kims Hospital on 30 October, 2015

decided to treat the same before marriage. He also wanted to undergo circumcision. For the said purposes he consulted third opposite party, the plastic surgeon ... third opposite party recommended excision of bilateral gynaecomastia and circumcision. The third opposite party informed Deepak that minor surgery was necessary and accordingly
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Mrs. Chandra Das (Saha) vs Dr. Bimal Saha, Md Radiologist on 4 September, 2023

patient advised for admission for the treatment of MCU test, thereafter circumcision and cystoscopy. The baby was admitted at AMRI Hospital on 10.09.2015 where circumcision ... diagnosed in 36 weeks of pregnancy. 20. The baby has undergone circumcision for Phimosis and its complications which developed after birth. Hence responsibility cannot
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 Next