Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 54952 (4.90 seconds)

State Of U.P vs Satish on 8 February, 2005

judgment of conviction. It was held that the case rested on circumstantial evidence and the circumstances highlighted by the prosecution did not inspire confidence. Three ... responsible for the crime. The case being one which rests on circumstantial evidence, the view taken by the High Court is a possible view
Supreme Court of India Cites 25 - Cited by 657 - A Pasayat - Full Document

State Of Rajasthan vs Raja Ram on 13 August, 2003

version, 7 witnesses were examined. The prosecution version rests on circumstantial evidence. The accused examined himself as DW-1 and placed on record materials ... counsel for the respondent-accused submitted that the case rests on circumstantial evidence and the chain of circumstances highlighted by the prosecution did not lead
Supreme Court of India Cites 18 - Cited by 511 - A Pasayat - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next