free of cost to the City
Improvement Trust Board (for short, 'CITB'), now
vested with the BDA. Further, it is stated that ... land
was given free of cost to CITB at the time of sale of
palace lands to the then CITB in the Upper and Lower
free of cost to the City
Improvement Trust Board (for short, 'CITB'), now
vested with the BDA. Further, it is stated that ... land
was given free of cost to CITB at the time of sale of
palace lands to the then CITB in the Upper and Lower
then City Improvement Trust Board (for short 'the CITB),
seeking acquisition of certain lands including the property of
the petitioner, which was then ... case of the petitioner,
that on 12.05.1964, respondent No.1, the then CITB has
passed an award determining compensation to be paid
pursuant
EXTENSION OF BANASHANKARI, BANGALORE BY THE
CITB/BDA-R1 DATED 10.07.1974 IN FAOUR OF SMT.
KAMALAMMA VIDE ANNEXURE-"F".
THIS PETITION, COMING ... site No.1221, II Stage Extension of
Banashankari, Bangalore by the CITB/BDA-R-1
dated 10.07.1974 in faour of Smt. Kamalamma
(vide Annx
acquisition of
lands for the purpose of formation of layout by CITB, Ex.P13 is the
57
O.S. No.1560/2018
notice issued ... schedule property, Ex.D11 is the re-conveyance deed
executed by CITB in favour of one Narasimhaiah with respect to
written statement schedule property
formed 36 sites each
measuring 43 ft. X 65 ft. Later, the CITB through the
Government of Mysore initiated acquisition proceedings
of the land during ... Apex
Court. In the interregnum period, the CITB formed 16
sites each measuring 60X90 ft. and by virtue of
resolution dated 20.12.1967 decided
2954/2016
C/w.
O.S.No.3845/2016
CITB as preliminary has issued preliminary notification in respect of
said Sy. No.43 measuring ... such Rangappa's property has not been acquired by
CITB, final notification is not been issued and as such he was a
possession
2954/2016
C/w.
O.S.No.3845/2016
CITB as preliminary has issued preliminary notification in respect of
said Sy. No.43 measuring ... such Rangappa's property has not been acquired by
CITB, final notification is not been issued and as such he was a
possession
registered
sale deed dt:.1.12.1957 by the second defendant BDA, the
then CITB. The suit schedule property has not been
acquired and the same ... been
included in the Gayathri devi park has layout nor
purchased by CITB even the Government has not acquired
the schedule property. Therefore the same
2367/84
6. The plaintiffs contended that in the meantime
the CITB had issued a notification on 1st September ... left out from the acquisition in favour of the
plaintiffs by the CITB. But they claims to have not
objected for the acquisition notification
