Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 1 of 1 (0.23 seconds)

Smt Akkamahadevi W/O Venkanagouda ... vs Sri Basanagouda S/O Mallanagouda ... on 26 November, 2021

The learned counsel also relied upon the judgment of Madras High Court in CRL.O.P.No.13147/2015 and 9 CRL.M.P.Nos.1 and 2 of 2015 disposed of on 23.07.2019 in the case of Rangabashyam and another vs. Ramesh wherein at paragraph-19 the Court has observed that Section 141 of the N.I. Act deals with the concept of vicarious liability, wherein for the offence committed by the Company or a partnership firm, the directors or the partners, as the case may, are deemed to be guilty of the offence when it is shown that they are in charge of and responsible for the conduct of the day-to- day affairs of the business or the firm, as the case may be. While interpreting the provision, the Hon'ble Apex Court has categorically held that complaint cannot be maintained against the directors of the Company, without making the company as an accused person. This concept has been extended even for Partnership Firms. The registration or non-registration of the Partnership Firm will have no bearing insofar as Section 141 of the N.I. Act is concerned.
Karnataka High Court Cites 19 - Cited by 0 - H P Sandesh - Full Document
1