Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 934 (2.26 seconds)
Documents citing R. P. Kapur vs The State Of Punjab on 25 March, 1960

Virendra Singh And 2 Others vs State Of U.P. And Another on 29 May, 2025

It was further observed that while examining the FIR/complaint, quashing of which is sought, the court cannot embark upon an enquiry as to the reliability or genuineness or otherwise of the allegations made therein, but if the court thinks fit, regard being had to the parameters of quashing and the self-restraint imposed by law, and more particularly, the parameters laid down by this Court in R.P. Kapur v. State of Punjab52 and State of Haryana v. Bhajan Lal53, the court would have jurisdiction to quash the FIR/complaint.
Allahabad High Court Cites 61 - Cited by 0 - M R Chauhan - Full Document

Suresh Pandey vs State Of U.P. And Anr. on 9 December, 2019

In fact while exercising the inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C. or while wielding the powers under Article 226 of the Constitution of India the quashing of the complaint can be done only if it does not disclose any offence or if there is any legal bar which prohibits the proceedings on its basis. The Apex Court decisions in R.P. Kapur Vs. State of Punjab AIR 1960 SC 866 and State of Haryana Vs. Bhajan Lal 1992 SCC(Cr.) 426 make the position of law in this regard clear recognizing certain categories by way of illustration which may justify the quashing of a complaint or charge sheet.
Allahabad High Court Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - M R Chauhan - Full Document

Satyendra Kumar Upadhyay And 2 Ors vs State Of U.P. And Another on 11 December, 2019

In fact while exercising the inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C. or while wielding the powers under Section 226 of the Constitution of India the quashing of the complaint can be done only if it does not disclose any offence or if there is any legal bar which prohibits the proceedings on its basis. The Apex Court decisions in R.P. Kapur Vs. State of Punjab reported in AIR 1960 SC 866 and State of Haryana Vs. Bhajan Lal reported in 1992 SCC(Cr.) 426 make the position of law in this regard clear recognizing certain categories by way of illustration which may justify the quashing of a complaint or charge sheet.
Allahabad High Court Cites 17 - Cited by 2 - M R Chauhan - Full Document

Masoom Ali And 4 Others vs State Of U.P. And Another on 17 December, 2019

In fact while exercising the inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C. or while wielding the powers under Section 226 of the Constitution of India the quashing of the complaint can be done only if it does not disclose any offence or if there is any legal bar which prohibits the proceedings on its basis. The Apex Court decisions in R.P. Kapur Vs. State of Punjab AIR 1960 SC 866 and State of Haryana Vs. Bhajan Lal 1992 SCC(Cr.) 426 make the position of law in this regard clear recognizing certain categories by way of illustration which may justify the quashing of a complaint or charge sheet.
Allahabad High Court Cites 20 - Cited by 0 - M R Chauhan - Full Document

Rajesh Kumar vs State Of U.P. And Another on 16 December, 2019

In fact while exercising the inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C. or while wielding the powers under Section 226 of the Constitution of India the quashing of the complaint can be done only if it does not disclose any offence or if there is any legal bar which prohibits the proceedings on its basis. The Apex Court decisions in R.P. Kapur Vs. State of Punjab AIR 1960 SC 866 and State of Haryana Vs. Bhajan Lal 1992 SCC(Cr.) 426 make the position of law in this regard clear recognizing certain categories by way of illustration which may justify the quashing of a complaint or charge sheet.
Allahabad High Court Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - M R Chauhan - Full Document

Dilip Yadav vs State Of U.P.And Another on 6 January, 2020

In fact while exercising the inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C. or while wielding the powers under Article 226 of the Constitution of India the quashing of the complaint can be done only if it does not disclose any offence or if there is any legal bar which prohibits the proceedings on its basis. The Apex Court decisions in R.P. Kapur Vs. State of Punjab AIR 1960 SC 866 and State of Haryana Vs. Bhajan Lal 1992 SCC(Cr.) 426 make the position of law in this regard clear recognizing certain categories by way of illustration which may justify the quashing of a complaint or charge sheet.
Allahabad High Court Cites 15 - Cited by 1 - M R Chauhan - Full Document

Sohanveer Singh vs State Of Up And Another on 29 September, 2020

12. In fact while exercising the inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C. or while wielding the powers under Section 226 of the Constitution of India the quashing of the complaint can be done only if it does not disclose any offence or if there is any legal bar which prohibits the proceedings on its basis. The Apex Court decisions in R.P. Kapur Vs. State of Punjab reported in AIR 1960 SC 866 and State of Haryana Vs. Bhajan Lal reported in 1992 SCC(Cr.) 426 make the position of law in this regard clear recognizing certain categories by way of illustration which may justify the quashing of a complaint or charge sheet.
Allahabad High Court Cites 21 - Cited by 0 - M R Chauhan - Full Document

Vineet Agarwal And 2 Others vs State Of U.P. And Another on 11 November, 2020

In the case of Harishchandra Prasad Mani and others (supra), it was held in para 12 that it is well settled by a series of decisions of this Court that cognizance cannot be taken unless there is at least some material indicating the guilt of the accused vide R.P. Kapur v. State of Punjab AIR 1960 SC 866: (1960) 3 SCR 388: 1960 Cri LJ 1239, State of Haryana v. Bhajan Lal 1992 Supp (1) SCC 335: 1992 SCC (Cri) 426, Janata Dal v. H.S. Chowdhary (1992) 4 SCC 305: 1993 SCC (Cri) 36, Raghubir Saran (Dr.) v. State of Bihar AIR 1964 SC 1:(1964) 2 SCR 336:(1964) 1 CRi LJ 1, State of Karnataka v. M Devendrappa (2002) 3 SCC 89: 2002 SCC (Cri) 539 and Zandu Pharmaceutical Works Ltd. v. Mohd. Sharaful Haque (2005) 1 SCC 122: 2005 SCC (Cri) 283.
Allahabad High Court Cites 19 - Cited by 4 - M R Chauhan - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next