Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 1 of 1 (0.37 seconds)

Mansukhbhai Kanjibhai Shah vs State Of Gujarat on 2 February, 2018

(4) In Sakshi vs. Union of India reported in (2004)5 SCC 518 again the Hon'ble the Supreme Court of India has held that It is well settled principle that the intention of the Legislature is primarily to be gathered form the language Page 29 of 90 HC-NIC Page 29 of 90 Created On Thu Feb 08 23:44:41 IST 2018 R/CR.RA/1188/2017 CAV JUDGMENT used, which means that attention should be paid to what has been said as also to what has not been said. As a consequence a construction which requires for its support addition or substitution of words or which results in rejection of words as meaningless has to be avoided. It is contrary to all rules of construction to read words into an Act unless it is absolutely necessary to do so. Similarly it is wrong and dangerous to proceed by substituting some other words for words of the statute. It is equally well settled that a statute enacting an offence or imposing a penalty is strictly construed. The fact that an enactment is a penal provision is in itself a reason for hesitating before ascribing to phrases used in it a meaning broarder than that they would ordinarily bear.
Gujarat High Court Cites 80 - Cited by 0 - S G Shah - Full Document
1