Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.92 seconds)
Documents citing Vinay Varma vs Kanika Pasricha & Anr. on 29 November, 2019

Neelam Ahuja vs Raj Ahuja & Ors. on 6 September, 2024

14. Perusal of Paragraph 16 of the Impugned Order reveals that the Petitioner is in possession of six properties, which include residential premises. Counsel for the Petitioner asserts that these properties were acquired by her between 2010 and 2012, during the subsistence of her marriage. Although it is contended that these properties are not in a habitable condition and that they are self-acquired assets, subject to a 10 Vinay Varma v. Kanika Pasricha, 2019 SCC OnLine Del 11530.
Delhi High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - S Narula - Full Document
1