Search Results Page

Search Results

91 - 100 of 1129 (3.35 seconds)
Documents citing Bachan Singh Etc. Etc vs State Of Punjab Etc. Etc on 16 August, 1982

Principal Sessions Judge vs Marimuthu, Son Of Balaswamy on 26 March, 2004

While considering the death sentence under Section 302, IPC with reference to "special reasons as provided in sub-section 3 of Section 354, Cr.P.C., after referring to the decisions in Bachan Singh v. State of Punjab, and in Machhi Singh and after noting the factual finding that 9 year old child was sacrificed in the most brutal and diabolic manner which falls within the "rarest of rare" category, the Supreme Court upheld the death sentence awarded and dismissed the appeal.
Madras High Court Cites 26 - Cited by 0 - P Sathasivam - Full Document

Nihal Ahmed Rais Ahmed Shaikh vs . on 7 May, 2013

78. Similarly, after considering the submission of the learned counsel for A-2 and particularly that of A-1 being the leader of the group involved in commission of said offences and/or the role played by said A-2 being secondary in the whole episode or atleast the evidence having not denoted the said accused having played a role attracting any of the factors given in the case of Bachan Singh (supra) would be a factor for coming to the conclusion of even his case not falling under the category of rarest of rare case warranting the capital punishment.
Bombay High Court Cites 80 - Cited by 0 - P D Kode - Full Document

Mohammad Sadiq Mir (Alias) Sada Age 38 ... vs State Of Jammu And Kashmir on 15 October, 2024

In Panchhi v. State of U.P. it has been observed that the brutality of the manner in which the murder was perpetrated may not be the sole ground for judging whether the case is one of the "rarest of rare cases", as indicated in Bachan Singh v. State of Punjab and that every murder being per se brutal, the distinguishing factors should really be the mitigating or aggravating features surrounding the murder. The intensity of bitterness, which prevailed, and the escalation of simmering thoughts into a thirst for revenge or retaliation were held to be also a relevant factor."
Jammu & Kashmir High Court - Srinagar Bench Cites 50 - Cited by 0 - S Kumar - Full Document

Lochan Shriwas vs State Of Chhattisgarh 15 Cra/328/2012 ... on 17 November, 2017

55. The issue again came up before Hon'ble Apex Court in Ramnaresh & others v. State of Chhattisgarh reported in (2012) 4 SCC 257, wherein the Supreme Court reiterated the 13 aggravating and 7 mitigating circumstances as laid down in the case of Bachan Singh (supra) required to be taken into consideration while applying the doctrine of "rarest of rare" case.
Chattisgarh High Court Cites 45 - Cited by 0 - P Diwaker - Full Document
Previous   6 7 8 9 10   11 12 13 14 15 Next