Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.67 seconds)
Documents citing Khushwant Singh And Anr. vs Maneka Gandhi on 18 September, 2001

M/S. Juggernaut Books Pvt. Ltd vs Swami Ramdev on 28 April, 2018

because (c) while giving such finding, the Ld. Trial Court has not noted that as per the law laid down in Khushwant Singh v Maneka Gandhi, AIR 2002 Del 58, Indu Jain v Forbes Incorporated, (2007) ILR 8 Delhi 9, Tata Sons v Greenpeace International and Anr., 2011 SCC OnLine Del 466, Dr. Shashi Tharur   v   Arnab   Goswami   and   Anr.,   2017   SCC   OnLine   Del   12049,   the usual course, in suits like the present suit, is to protect the right of freedom and speech guaranteed to an individual/journalist/author, as guaranteed under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution of India, unless the defense of truth,   fair   comment   and   fair   reporting,   pleaded   by   the individual/journalist/author, appears to be completely meritless. 1
Delhi District Court Cites 19 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Priyanka Pathak Narain vs Swami Ramdev on 28 April, 2018

perverse/infirm and warrants this Court to set aside the impugned Order, because (a) while giving such finding, the Ld. Trial Court has gone beyond the pleadings of the plaint of the subject suit, because (b) while giving such finding in impugned Order, the Ld. Trial Court has not noted that the book of the appellant  was  already available in the  market for reading  by the public,   on   account  of   the   publication   and  sale   done  by   the   respondent no.2, before passing of the ex­parte ad­interim injunction Order, by the Ld. Trial Court, on 04.08.2017 and as a consequence thereof, as aforesaid, the balance of convenience qua the prohibition/ban on the publication and sale of the book of the appellant, actually exists in favor the appellant and because (c) while giving such finding, the Ld. Trial Court has not noted that as per the law laid down in Khushwant Singh v Maneka Gandhi, AIR 2002 Del 58, Indu Jain v Forbes Incorporated, (2007) ILR 8 Delhi 9, Tata Sons v Greenpeace International and Anr., 2011 SCC OnLine Del 466, Dr. Shashi Tharur   v   Arnab   Goswami   and   Anr.,   2017   SCC   OnLine   Del   12049,   the usual course, in suits like the present suit, is to protect the right of freedom and speech guaranteed to an individual/journalist/author, as guaranteed under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution of India, unless the defense of truth,   fair   comment   and   fair   reporting,   pleaded   by   the individual/journalist/author, appears to be completely meritless. 1
Delhi District Court Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

K.R. Chadha & Ors. vs . Y.S. Srivastava on 19 January, 2013

In the matter of Khushwant Singh & Anr. Vs. Maneka Gandhi, AIR 2002 Delhi 58, the court vacated the injunction granted against the defendants from publishing, circulating or selling the autobiography pertaining to the respondent and her family by observing that "The reason is because the Contd....P..15 of 16 : 16 : interest of the public in knowing the truth outweighs the interest of the plaintiff in maintaining his reputation."
Delhi District Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1