Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 7 of 7 (1.44 seconds)
Documents citing Ghulam Qadir vs Special Tribunal & Ors on 3 October, 2001

Jan Chetna And Another vs Moef And Others on 9 February, 2012

In the case of Gulam Qadir Vs Special Tribunal and other 2002 (1) SCC 33, the Supreme Court observed that an orthodox rule of interpretation regarding the locus-standi of a person to reach the Court has undergone a sea change and the constitutional courts have been adopting a liberal approach in dealing with the cases or the claims of litigants. It is well settled that in construing remedial statute the courts ought to give to it widest operation which its language will permit. The words of such a statue must be so construed as to give the most complete remedy which the phraseology will permit, so as to secure the relief contemplated by the Statute is not denied to the class intended to be relieved.
National Green Tribunal Cites 22 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

(Service Of All Notices On The vs Shri B.N. Vaish on 28 June, 2013

In the case of Ghulam Qadir v. Special Tribunal (2002) 1 SCC 33: 2001 Supp (3) SCR 504, the Honble Apex Court had laid down the legal position on locus standi, stating that the rights under Article 226 of the Constitution of India can be enforced only by an aggrieved person, except in the case where the writ prayed for is for habeas corpus, or quo warranto. Therefore, whether the Writ Petitioners in the instant case before the Honble High Court, Shri R.N. Baishya, Director, Directorate of Health Services, and Shri Manoj Chauhan, Joint Director, Directorate of Indian System of Medicine & Homoeopathy, Govt. of NCT of Delhi, (who, incidentally, have not been named as the respondents/alleged contemners before us in the present Contempt Petition proceedings), had a locus standi to approach the Honble High Court, in a Writ Petition under Article 226, as a person aggrieved, is a legal point which needed being alluded to. Whether a Government employee, performing his official duties, has a proprietary interest, or the interest of a trustee, in protesting against the orders of this Tribunal in a contempt petition, to make certain further payments, would perhaps need to be examined by the Superior Courts in an appropriate case.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 143 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1