Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.25 seconds)

New Amazing Shiksha Society, Ghaziabad vs Ito(Exemption Ward), Ghaziabad on 26 February, 2019

She also filed a letter dated 23.1.2019 stating therein that the assessee is an educational institution and had claimed exemption u/s. 10(23C)(iiiad) of the Act, for the AY 2014-15 as total receipts for the year under consideration was less than 1 Crore and thus, entire surplus of Rs. 12,01,906/- is not taxable as per provision of law and in this regard, she attached the utilization of surplus generated during AY 2014-15, over the years alognwith supporting documents. She also filed the copy of the Income Tax Department Circular No. 11/2008 dated 19.12.2008 stipulating therein the Definition of 'Charitable purpose' under section 2(15) of the Income 6 Tax Act. In support of her contention she also filed another Paper Book containing pages 1-310 in which she has attached the copy of judicial pronouncements covering the case of the assessee viz. St. Lawrence Educational Society (Regd.) vs. CIT (2013) 353 ITR 320 (Delhi); CIT vs. Surat Art Silk Clothes Manufacturers Association (1980) 121 ITR 1 (SC); IILM Foundation vs. ADIT, ITA No. 1142/Del/2011, dated of pronouncement on 8.11.2017 (ITAT, Delhi).
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Delhi Cites 20 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Acit(E), New Delhi vs India International Centre, New Delhi on 13 September, 2019

In St. Lawrence Educational Society (Regd.) v. CIT (2011) 197 Taxman 504/9 taxmann.com 233 (Delhi) "Merely because educational institutions run by assessee-society were generating surplus year after year, it could not be a ground to say that said educational institutions existed for purpose of profit and not for purpose of education [Assessment year 2009-10]"
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Delhi Cites 30 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1