Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.02 seconds)

Saleem Khan vs State Of Rajasthan & Ors on 15 July, 2014

3. Briefly, the indispensable essential material facts are: that the petitioner instituted writ proceedings registered as S.B. Civil Writ Petition Number 484 of 1985 (Saleem Khan v. State of Rajasthan & Ors.), assailing the order of the Principal, Superintendent of Police, Kota, dated 24th February, 1983, terminating his service for his alleged absence from duty for 19 days as informed by the Principal, Rajasthan Police Academy, vide order dated 15th February, 1983. This Court taking into consideration the facts and materials available on record, also examined the validity of the Standing Order Number 10/76, and concluded that the requirement of holding an enquiry, where the service of an employee is being terminated, on the specific allegation of misconduct, namely, absence during the course of training, cannot be dispensed with. In the result, the writ application of the petitioner was allowed quashing the order dated 24th February, 1983, impugned therein with a further direction to reinstate the petitioner and provide another opportunity of training afresh. In the event, the petitioner successfully completed the training, he would be entitled for confirmation in service along with all other consequential benefits but for actual salary for the period between 24th February, 1983 till the date of order i.e. 28th January, 1993.
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Saleem Khan vs The State Of Rajasthan Through P.P on 19 June, 2015

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH JAIPUR O R D E R S.B. CR. MISC. SUSPENSION OF SENTENCE APPLICATION NO. 259/2014 IN S.B. CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 409/2014 Saleem Khan Vs. The State of Rajasthan through P.P. DATE OF ORDER : 19/06/2015 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Atul Kumar Jain V.J. Mr. Rajesh Sharma, for the applicant Ms. Manisha Pareek, PP for the State Accused appellant Saleem Khan was convicted in Cr. Case No.3/2013 by the Addl. Sessions Judge No.7, Jaipur Metro, Jaipur on 11.2.2014 for offence under Section 328 IPC by seven years' imprisonment and a fine of Rs.2000/-. Accused appellant Saleem Khan wants suspension of sentence in this matter. But this Court is not inclined to grant benefit of suspension of sentence to accused appellant Saleem Khan in the circumstances of the case. The trial court has mentioned in its judgment that in one other criminal case also the accused appellant had been convicted by another court. SHO, Police Station, Transport Nagar, Jaipur has also submitted list of ten other criminal cases registered against accused appellant Saleem Khan in different police stations of Jaipur and almost all those cases were registered for offences under sections 392, 397, 394 or 328 IPC etc. This Court is of considered view that benefit of suspension of sentence should not be given to habitual criminals. At the time of disposal of their application under Section 389 Cr.P.C. their criminal antecedents cannot be ignored. In the circumstances, application under Section 389 Cr.P.C. filed by Saleem Khan is hereby dismissed. If the accused appellant submits an application in writing before the regular Bench hearing the appeal for early hearing of his appeal then he should also submit a copy of this order before the concerned Bench and in that case, the concerned Bench is requested to give top priority to hearing of the appeal of accused Saleem Khan.
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1