Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 17 (0.87 seconds)
Documents citing Rampal Singh vs State Of U.P on 24 July, 2012

Raval Shaileshbhai Rameshbhai ... vs State Of Gujarat on 17 February, 2026

20. This Court in the aforesaid case of Rampal Singh (supra) further explained the difference between Page 21 of 25 Uploaded by MR.KAUSHAL.M. RATHOD(HCD0078) on Tue Feb 17 2026 Downloaded on : Sat Mar 14 02:14:11 IST 2026 NEUTRAL CITATION R/CR.A/1456/2018 JUDGMENT DATED: 17/02/2026 undefined these two offences from the perspective of the punitive provisions of Sections 302 and 304 IPC by grading the offences in three categories as follows:
Gujarat High Court Cites 27 - Cited by 0 - I J Vora - Full Document

Ajaypari Hiteshpari Goswami vs State Of Gujarat on 18 February, 2025

Once an offence is caused in any of the three stated manners noted-above, it would be culpable homicide. Section 300 of the IPC, however, deals with murder, although there is no clear definition of murder in Section 300 of the IPC. As has been repeatedly held by this Court, culpable homicide is the genus and murder is its species and all murders are culpable homicides but all culpable homicides are not murders. (see Rampal Singh v. State of U.P., (2012) 8 SCC
Gujarat High Court Cites 23 - Cited by 0 - I J Vora - Full Document

Kasam @ King Mohmadbhai Shaikh vs State Of Gujarat on 27 March, 2025

23. It would be beneficial to refer the observation of the Supreme Court in case of Rampal Singh Vs. State of U. P. 2012 (8) SCC 289. In the context of applying 304 Part I and II, the Supreme Court held and observed that, every case must essentially be decided on its own merits and the court has to perform very delicate function of applying the provisions of the code to the facts of the case with a clear demarcation as to under what category of cases, the case at hand falls and accordingly, punish the accused.
Gujarat High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - I J Vora - Full Document
1   2 Next