citedby: 12565578 year: 2022

Pappu @ Sohanvir vs State Of U.P. on 21 June, 2022

48. Referring to an earlier decision in Mohinder Pal Jolly vs. State of Punjab11, it was noted in Rampal Singh (supra) that the distinction between two parts of Section 304 has been stated with some clarity therein which reads as under:-

Allahabad High Court Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Manoj Kumar Sharma vs State Of U.P. on 31 May, 2022

56. Referring to an earlier decision in Mohinder Pal Jolly vs. State of Punjab20, it was noted in Rampal Singh (supra) that the distinction between two parts of Section 304 has been stated with some clarity therein which reads as under:-

Allahabad High Court Cites 23 - Cited by 7 - S Agarwal - Full Document

Ajay S/O Venkatesh Madar vs The State Of Karnataka on 29 November, 2022

15. We have carefully gone through the decision cited by the learned Amicus Curiae in the case of RAMPAL SINGH Vs. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH reported in (2012) 8 SCC 289 but these facts and circumstances are not consistent to this case on hand.

Karnataka High Court Cites 19 - Cited by 0 - S Govindaraj - Full Document

Badan Yadav @ Badan Singh vs State Of U P And 2 Others on 4 November, 2022

List thereafter along with the records of Criminal Misc. Writ Petition No. 15959 of 2022 (Rampal Vs. State of U.P. and others).

Allahabad High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - M C Tripathi - Full Document

Sri.Gangappa vs The State Of Karnataka on 9 March, 2022

25. It is relevant to refer to the distinction between culpable homicide and murder. Culpable homicide is the genus and 'murder' its species. All murders are culpable homicides but not vice-versa. Speaking generally, all culpable homicide does not amount to murder. The same has been extensively addressed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Rampal Singh Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh reported in 2012 (8) SCC 289. Insofar as the presumption relating to the evidence or knowledge of the accused who is said to struck on his wife a violent blow on the head with which rendered her unconscious or inflicts of injuries over her person even the intention of the accused must be judged and not in the light of the actual circumstance but in the light of the, what is supposed to be the circumstances?

Karnataka High Court Cites 28 - Cited by 0 - K Somashekar - Full Document

Kali Prasad vs State Of U.P. on 10 May, 2022

24. Referring to an earlier decision in Mohinder Pal Jolly vs. State of Punjab12, it was noted in Rampal Singh (supra) that the distinction between two parts of Section 304 has been stated with some clarity therein which reads as under:-

Allahabad High Court Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Kali Prasad vs State Of U.P. on 10 May, 2022

24. Referring to an earlier decision in Mohinder Pal Jolly vs. State of Punjab12, it was noted in Rampal Singh (supra) that the distinction between two parts of Section 304 has been stated with some clarity therein which reads as under:-

Allahabad High Court Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs . 1)Jogender Singh on 21 May, 2022

a) Rampal Singh Vs State of UP 2012 (6) SCALE 574

Delhi District Court Cites 28 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Shyamveer Singh vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 14 February, 2022

In support of his contention, he has relied upon the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Rampal Singh vs. State of UP reported in (2012) 8 SCC 289. It is further submitted that there is no sufficient ground for proceeding against accused- which clearly shows that the Judge is not a mere post office to frame the charge at the behest of the prosecution, but has to exercise his judicial mind to the facts of case in order to determine whether a case for trial has been made out by prosecution.

Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 16 - Cited by 2 - R K Shrivastava - Full Document

Siri Harijan And Another vs State on 31 August, 2022

27. Referring to an earlier decision in Mohinder Pal Jolly vs. State of Punjab12, it was noted in Rampal Singh (supra) that the distinction between two parts of Section 304 has been stated with some clarity therein which reads as under:-

Allahabad High Court Cites 19 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Search Results Page

Refine Search

Search Results