Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.43 seconds)

Arvind Dasrao Bokil And Ors vs The State Of Mah And Anr on 10 December, 2018

10. Mr. R.B. Deshmukh, learned counsel for the appellants relied on the case of Tilak Raj Bhalla Vs. Ulhas Narayan Sanvordekar [2005(4) Bom.C.R. 16]. In this case, the plaintiff entered into agreement with the defendant and handed over management of his business of Bar and Restaurant to the defendant. The agreement provided that defendant was to pay royalty of contractual amount of Rs.2500/- per month and in case he would fail to pay the said amount for 5 months, the agreement would come to an end and the defendant would hand over vacant possession. The plaintiff alleged that, the defendant was defaulter and claimed him to be trespasser and claimed mesne profits. The defendant claimed that he was permanently inducted in the premises on payment of agreed compensation amount and the terms were incorporated so as to avoid the clutches of Rent Act. Though there was no specific prayer for possession, there was issue to that effect. This Court held that, the trial Court had allowed the application for amendment, but it ::: Uploaded on - 12/12/2018 ::: Downloaded on - 26/12/2018 22:50:23 ::: Second Appeal No.98/2014 ::: 7 :::
Bombay High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - A M Dhavale - Full Document
1