Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.26 seconds)

The Managing Director vs Sandeep K H on 1 February, 2023

He also placed reliance on the judgment of the Rajasthan High Court in the case of Makbool Ahmed and Others vs Bhura Lal and Others reported in AIR 1986 Rajasthan 177. -9- MFA No. 1074 of 2018 C/W MFA No. 8005 of 2017 Upon considering the facts and circumstances stated in the above decisions, they are different from the present case. No doubt it is the duty on the part of the driver and conductor of the bus to observe whether any person is getting down from the door. But when the claimant had suddenly moved towards the door and tried to get down from the moving bus, it also shows negligence on the part of the claimant. These facts constitute difference in the above stated judgments. Hence, they are not applicable.
Karnataka High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - H Sanjeevkumar - Full Document

Sandeep K.H vs V Umesha on 1 February, 2023

He also placed reliance on the judgment of the Rajasthan High Court in the case of Makbool Ahmed and Others vs Bhura Lal and Others reported in AIR 1986 Rajasthan 177. -9- MFA No. 1074 of 2018 C/W MFA No. 8005 of 2017 Upon considering the facts and circumstances stated in the above decisions, they are different from the present case. No doubt it is the duty on the part of the driver and conductor of the bus to observe whether any person is getting down from the door. But when the claimant had suddenly moved towards the door and tried to get down from the moving bus, it also shows negligence on the part of the claimant. These facts constitute difference in the above stated judgments. Hence, they are not applicable.
Karnataka High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - H Sanjeevkumar - Full Document
1