Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 34 (3.02 seconds)
Documents citing State Of Bihar Etc. Etc vs P.P. Sharma, Ias And Anr on 2 April, 1991

Sh. B.S. Thind And Etc. vs State Of H.P. And Anr. on 6 April, 1992

22. There is another aspect of the case on which the Chief Judicial Magistrate has opined that it will be only after evidence is adduced by both the parties whereby the complainant respondent proves his case and the petitioners establish their defence and also that they have acted in discharge of their official duty that question of sanction can be determined. For taking this view, he has referred to a Supreme Court judgment in State of Bihar v. Shri P.P. Sharma, (1991) 2 JT 147 : AIR 1991 SC 1260 : 1991 Cri LJ 1438. In para 68 of this judgment, K. Ramaswamy, J., has observed :--
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 29 - Cited by 1 - Full Document

Varun Bhardwaj vs State Of H.P on 25 April, 2017

28. At this stage, we may also notice that the principle stated by this Court in the case of Madhavrao Jiwaji Rao Scindia (supra) was reconsidered and explained in two subsequent judgments of this Court in the cases of State of Bihar & Anr. v. Shri P.P. Sharma & Anr. [AIR 1991 SC 1260] and M.N. Damani v. S.K. Sinha & Ors. [AIR 2001 SC 2037]. In the subsequent judgment, the Court held that, that judgment did not declare a law of universal application and what was the principle relating to disputes involving cases of a predominantly civil nature with or without criminal intent."
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 66 - Cited by 3 - S Sharma - Full Document

Now Known As Progility Technologies ... vs Central Bureau Of Investigation on 30 August, 2019

In Sanjaysinh Ramrao Chavan's case, (2015) 3 SCC 123, relied upon by the petitioner, the Apex Court, referring judgments passed in State of Karnataka Vs. L. Muniswamy, (1977) 2 SCC 699 and State of Bihar Vs. P.P. Sharma, 1992 Supp (1) SCC 222, has reiterated that unmerited and undeserved prosecution is an infringement of the guarantee under Article 21 of the Constitution of India and once it is found that there is no material on record to connect an accused with the crime, there is no meaning in prosecuting him and it would be a sheer waste of public time and money to permit such proceedings to continue against such a person. There can be hardly any dispute in regard to principle of criminal jurisprudence re-iterated in this judgment.
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 24 - Cited by 2 - V S Thakur - Full Document

Govind Thakur vs Of on 6 November, 2015

705]; Ganesh Narayan Hegde v. s. Bangarappa & Ors. [(1995) 4 SCC 41]; Zundu Pharmaceutical Works Ltd. v. Mohd. Sharaful Haque & Ors. [AIR 2005 SC 9]; M/s. Medchl Chemicals & Pharma (P) Ltd. v. M/s. Biological E. Ltd. & Ors. [AIR 2000 SC 1869]; Shakson Belthissor v. State of Kerala & Anr. [(2009) 14 SCC 466]; V.V.S. Rama Sharma & Ors. v. State of U.P. & Ors. [(2009) 7 SCC 234]; Chunduru Siva Ram Krishna & Anr. v. Peddi of Ravindra Babu & Anr.[(2009) 11 SCC 203]; Sheo Nandan Paswan v. State of Bihar & Ors.[AIR 1987 SC 877]; State of Bihar & Anr. v. P.P. Sharma & Anr.[AIR 1991 SC 1260]; Lalmuni Devi (Smt.) v. rt State of Bihar & Ors.[(2001) 2 SCC 17]; M. Krishnan v. Vijay Singh & Anr.[(2001) 8 SCC 645]; Savita v. State of Rajasthan [(2005) 12 SCC 338]; and S.M. Datta v. State of Gujarat & Anr. [(2001) 7 SCC 659]}.
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 40 - Cited by 0 - T S Chauhan - Full Document

Arjun Kalia vs Ashok Kumar And Another on 5 October, 2016

Peddi Ravindra Babu & Anr. [(2009) 11 SCC 203]; Sheo Nandan Paswan v. State of Bihar & Ors. [AIR 1987 SC 877]; State of Bihar & Anr. v. P.P. Sharma & Anr. [AIR 1991 SC 1260]; Lalmuni Devi (Smt.) v. State of Bihar & Ors. [(2001) 2 SCC 17]; M. Krishnan v. Vijay Singh & Anr. [(2001) 8 SCC 645]; Savita v. State of Rajasthan [(2005) 12 SCC 338]; and S.M. Datta v. State of Gujarat & Anr. [(2001) 7 SCC 659]}.
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 29 - Cited by 1 - T S Chauhan - Full Document

Shyam Lal Negi vs State Of Himachal Pradesh on 24 July, 2017

Peddi Ravindra Babu & Anr. [(2009) 11 SCC 203]; Sheo Nandan Paswan v. State of Bihar & Ors. [AIR 1987 SC 877]; State of Bihar & Anr. v. P.P. Sharma & Anr. [AIR 1991 SC 1260]; Lalmuni Devi (Smt.) v. State of Bihar & Ors. [(2001) 2 SCC 17]; M. Krishnan v. Vijay Singh & Anr. [(2001) 8 SCC 645]; Savita v. State of Rajasthan [(2005) 12 SCC 338]; and S.M. Datta v. State of Gujarat & Anr. [(2001) 7 SCC 659]}.
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 34 - Cited by 2 - T S Chauhan - Full Document

M/S Cnn-Ibn7 vs Maulana Mumtaz Ahmed Quasmi & Ors on 29 August, 2017

[(2009) 14 SCC 466]; V.V.S. Rama Sharma & Ors. v. State of U.P. & Ors. [(2009) 7 SCC 234]; Chunduru Siva Ram Krishna & Anr. v. Peddi Ravindra Babu & Anr. [(2009) 11 SCC 203]; Sheo Nandan Paswan v. State of Bihar & Ors. [AIR 1987 SC 877]; State of Bihar & Anr. v. P.P. Sharma & Anr. [AIR 1991 SC 1260]; Lalmuni Devi (Smt.) v. State of Bihar & Ors. [(2001) 2 SCC 17]; M. Krishnan v. Vijay Singh & Anr. [(2001) 8 SCC 645]; Savita v. State of Rajasthan [(2005) 12 SCC 338]; and S.M. Datta v. State of Gujarat & Anr. [(2001) 7 SCC 659]}.
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 77 - Cited by 0 - T S Chauhan - Full Document
1   2 3 4 Next