Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 104 (1.50 seconds)
Documents citing State Of Nagaland vs Lipok Ao & Ors on 1 April, 2005

Director Agriculture State Of U P Krishi ... vs Adya Sharan Chaudhary & Others on 19 November, 2025

8. The case law relied upon by the petitioner i.e. State of Nagaland V. Lipok AO & Ors. (supra) relates to a criminal case wherein this is a consumer complaint related matter wherein the complainant / appeal / petition is expected to be decided in a time bound manner. The contentions in the delay condonation application show that the petitioner was not diligent in filing of this petition.
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Uhbvnl vs Jaswant Rai Sethi on 6 June, 2011

The facts of the instant case are fully attracted to State of Nagaland Vs. Lipok A.O. and others case (Supra). The facts and circumstances of the instant case reflects the error committed by the District Forum in issuing direction to the opposite party to releasing electricity connection without charging the impugned amount of Rs.16,.474/-. We think it a fit case to condone the delay. Hence, the delay of 51 days in filing of the present appeal is condoned.
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Life Insurance Corporation Of India vs Sri Amit Chakraborty on 12 December, 2012

Further, in the said case of State of Nagaland (supra), it was stated that a certain amount of latitude is not impermissible in the case of Government and due recognition of the limitations on governmental functioning-of course, within reasonable limits- is necessary if the judicial approach is not to be rendered unrealistic. In the present case before us, the unconscionable  default on the part of the officials cannot said to be within reasonable limits.
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 6 - Cited by 1 - Full Document

Haryana Urban Development Authority ... vs Smt. Santosh Gupta Wife Of Shri Kamal ... on 9 May, 2012

While dealing with the application for condonation of delay, it is not disputed that the delay cannot be condoned on the ground of equity and generosity, but at the same time it is to be taken into consideration that in case of any legal infirmity is committed by the District Consumer Forum while passing the impugned order which is apparent on record, the same cannot be allowed to continue as it would amount to no order in the eyes of law. Reference is made to the observation made by the Honble Supreme wherein it has been held that when the substantial justice and technical approach are pitted against each other, the former has to be performed. It has further been held that the words Sufficient Cause have to be interpreted to advance the cause of justice. The Honble Apex Court in case cited as State of Nagaland Vs. Lipok A.O. and others, 2005(3) SCC 752 has held as under:-
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Cholamandalam General Insurance Co. ... vs 1. Kashmir Singh Son Of Shri Ram Chander, ... on 16 July, 2012

While dealing with the application for condonation of delay, it is not disputed that the delay cannot be condoned on the ground of equity and generosity, but at the same time it is to be taken into consideration that in case of any legal infirmity is committed by the District Consumer Forum while passing the impugned order which is apparent on record, the same cannot be allowed to continue as it would amount to no order in the eyes of law. Reference is made to the observation made by the Honble Supreme wherein it has been held that when the substantial justice and technical approach are pitted against each other, the former has to be performed. It has further been held that the words Sufficient Cause have to be interpreted to advance the cause of justice. The Honble Apex Court in case cited as State of Nagaland Vs. Lipok A.O. and others, 2005(3) SCC 752 has held as under:-
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 5 - Cited by 16 - Full Document

Escorts Securities Ltd. 11, Scindia ... vs 1. Shri Dilbagh Singh Kadyan S/O Dalip ... on 17 December, 2012

There is delay of 102 days in filing of the instant appeal the condonation of which has been sought by moving an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act. The application is supported with an affidavit of Shri Bhuvnesh Singh Chauhan, authorised representative of M/s Escorts Securities Limited, 11, Scindia House, Connaught, Circus, New Delhi. While dealing with the application for condonation of delay, it is not disputed that the delay cannot be condoned on the ground of equity and generosity, but at the same time it is to be taken into consideration that in case of any legal infirmity is committed by the District Consumer Forum while passing the impugned order which is apparent on record, the same cannot be allowed to continue as it would amount to no order in the eyes of law. Reference is made to the observation made by the Honble Supreme wherein it has been held that when the substantial justice and technical approach are pitted against each other, the former has to be performed. It has further been held that the words Sufficient Cause have to be interpreted to advance the cause of justice. The Honble Apex Court in case cited as State of Nagaland Vs. Lipok A.O. and others, 2005(3) SCC 752 has held as under:-
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 20 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

1. National Insurance Co. Ltd. & Ors Sco ... vs 1. Sohan Singh Son Of Late Shri Laxman ... on 10 October, 2012

There is delay of 53 days in filing of the instant appeal the condonation of which has been sought by moving an application. The application is supported with an affidavit of Shri Rajwinder Kaur, Assistant Manager, National Insurance Co. Ltd. Regional Office-II, SCO No.337-338, Sectotr 35-B, Chandigarh. While dealing with the application for condonation of delay, it is not disputed that the delay cannot be condoned on the ground of equity and generosity, but at the same time it is to be taken into consideration that in case of any legal infirmity is committed by the District Consumer Forum while passing the impugned order which is apparent on record, the same cannot be allowed to continue as it would amount to no order in the eyes of law. Reference is made to the observation made by the Honble Supreme wherein it has been held that when the substantial justice and technical approach are pitted against each other, the former has to be performed. It has further been held that the words Sufficient Cause have to be interpreted to advance the cause of justice. The Honble Apex Court in case cited as State of Nagaland Vs. Lipok A.O. and others, 2005(3) SCC 752 has held as under:-
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next