Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 15 (0.96 seconds)
Documents citing State Of Uttar Pradesh & Ors vs Harish Chandra Singh on 17 January, 1969

State vs . Harish Chander Etc. on 25 October, 2019

20. On 174A IPC, argument of ld. defence counsel is that accused Lalji Yadav, who at the time of arrest, used to reside with his brother i.e. co­accused Harish Chander in H. No. 282, Gali No. 8, Chandan Park, Libaspur, Delhi, had some dispute with his brother and State Vs. Harish Chander etc. SC No. 57980/16; FIR No. 71/12, PS S.P. Badli Page No. 12 of 15 started residing separately from him. The court did not send notice, summons, bailable warrants, NBWs and process U/s 82 Cr.P.C. on the changed address. Next argument is that proclamation was not properly published because it was issued on 07.06.2013 and accused Lalji Yadav was to appear in the court on 27.07.2013. It was published only on 20.07.2013 and only seven days were given to the accused for appearance. Actually, the period should not be less than 30 days.
Delhi District Court Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs Harish Kumar on 9 April, 2013

8 In this case, so far as the witnesses examined are concerned, PW1 Sh. Kewal Kumar Kohli and PW2 Smt. Rita Kohli are the material witnesses of the prosecution. As discussed above, the testimony of PW1 is not convincing to a reasonable extent. He has not been able to state the incident elaborately and specifically. Being complainant and allegedly the injured in this case, his testimony must reflect a comprehensive and sensible story which is not available in the present case. It is also to be noted that during the course of cross­ Case No. 477/2/02 State Vs. Harish 4/6 examination conducted on behalf of the accused, he has deposed that he does not remember who caused him hurt.
Delhi District Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Uday Yadav vs State Of U.P. And Another on 14 March, 2023

The applicant could not have asked the questions relating to the statement given after the conclusion of his evidence in S.T. No. 196 of 2015 (State vs. Uday Yadav), since the evidence of P.W. 2 Pramod Kumar Sonkar recorded in S.T. No. 696 of 2019 (State vs. Harish Chandra), was material for the fair decision of the trial of S.T. No. No. 196 of 2015 and unless the opportunity to bring the real facts was not afforded to the applicant by his cross-examination there are chances of failure of justice.
Allahabad High Court Cites 27 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs . Harish on 15 December, 2012

1. The present case was registered on the complaint of complainant Sh. Balbir Singh in which he alleged that he is residing at H.No.S-33, Vishwas Park, Dabri, New Delhi. In front of his house, there was his vacant plot in which his two buffalows and one cow was tied up. On 30.04.2001 at about 11.30 pm, he heard the noise of chain of his buffalow. He awakened up and saw from the roof of his house that one person was bending towards the neck of his buffalow. He asked his son Naresh Kumar to see. When his son Naresh Kumar went into the plot, the accused tried to ran away but he was apprehended at the spot. At his complaint the present case was registered and after completion of 3 FIR No:338/2001 State Vs. Harish investigation challan was filed against accused the offence u/s 379/511 IPC.
Delhi District Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Harish Singh vs The State Of Uttarakhand on 18 May, 2021

4. This criminal revision, preferred by the revisionist u/s 397 read with Section 401 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter to be referred as Cr.P.C.), is directed against the judgment and order dated 11.10.2018 passed by learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Almora in Criminal Case No.16 of 2018, "State Vs. Harish Singh" whereby the revisionist was convicted u/s 380 IPC and sentenced to undergo three years' R.I. with a fine of Rs.10,000/- with default stipulation and U/s 457 IPC to undergo five years' R.I. with a fine of Rs.10,000/- with default stipulation as well as the judgment and order dated 10.01.2019 passed by learned Sessions Judge, Almora in 2 criminal appeal no.29 of 2018, "Harish Singh Vs. State", whereby the appellate Court dismissed the appeal and affirmed judgment and order dated 11.10.2018 passed by the trial Court.
Uttarakhand High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - R C Khulbe - Full Document

Smt Vimla Devi And Another vs State Of U.P. And Another on 17 February, 2023

The only prayer sought in the present application under section 482 Cr.P.C. is that to direct the learned Courts below to consider and decide the bail application of the applicants on the same day in pursuance of the bailable warrant issued by learned Courts below dated 01.11.2022 in Case No. 320 of 2021 (State Vs. Harish Chandra & Others), (arising out Case Crime No. 3 of 2021) under Sections 419, 420, 506 I.P.C., Police Station Maharajganj, District Jaunpur.
Allahabad High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - R Chaturvedi - Full Document

Sudershan Sharma (Aged 56 Years) vs State on 28 February, 2017

1.  Aggrieved by the judgment dated 29.10.2015 passed by Ld. MM­ 04,   West   District,   Tis   Hazari   Courts,   Delhi   in   a   case   bearing   FIR No.586/1995 U/s 342/387/506/34 IPC, PS Moti Nagar titled as State Vs. Harish Chand & Ors., whereby the accused persons (respondents no.2 Sudershan Sharma Vs. State & Ors. (CA No.54422/2016)    Page No.1 of pages 11 and 3 herein) were acquitted of the offence U/s 342/387/506/34 IPC, the complainant (appellant herein) has preferred the present appeal u/s 372 Cr.   P.C   on   02.12.2015   interalia  praying  for   setting   aside   the   impugned judgment.
Delhi District Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Harish Chandra@ Hari Chandra vs State Of U.P. And Another on 5 March, 2020

The present 482 Cr.P.C. application has been filed to quash the charge sheet dated 14.01.2019 cognizance order dated 03.12.2019 in S.S.T. No. 2167 of 2019 (State Vs. Harish Chandra) arising out of Case Crime No. 299 of 2018, under Sections 147, 323, 504, 506 I.P.C. and Section 3(1) (Da) of SC/ST Act, Police Station Nagar, District Basti, pending in the court of Special Judge, SC/ST Act, Basti.
Allahabad High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - N Tiwari - Full Document

Ranjeet Yadav And Others vs State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home ... on 8 April, 2022

"Wherefore, it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to quash the entire proceedings of Criminal Case No. 25322 of 2019 (State Vs. Harish Chandra and others) arising out of charge sheet dated 21.06.2018 submitted by the police in the aforesaid relating to Case Crime No. 378 of 2018, under Sections 323, 504, 506, 427, 380 and 384 IPC, Police Station Gudamba District Lucknow pending in the court of learned Judicial Magistrate-II, Lucknow."
Allahabad High Court Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - S K Gupta - Full Document
1   2 Next