Heirs Of Dinesh Maganlal Mehta vs Mahila Gruh Udyog Lijjat Papad & on 7 April, 2016
On the other hand, learned advocate Mr. Shah has drawn
attention to the decisions of this Court in the case of Superintendent
of Post Offices, Rajkot & Ors., v. Pratap Ghelabhai Maru & Ors.,
reported in 1987 ACJ 674 (para 3) in the case of Nasimbanu Wd/o.
Sirajuddin Amruddin Kazi & Ors., v. Ramjibhai Bachubhai Ahir
& Ors., reported in 2005 (2) GLR 1476 and in the case of United
India Insurance Co. Ltd., v. Fataben Jamalbhai reported in 2009
(2) GLR 1450. Distinguishing Mastan's case (supra), learned advocate
Mr. Shah referred para 4 of the said judgment and has pointed out
that unlike the present case in that case, only one vehicle was involved
Page 2 of 3
HC-NIC Page 2 of 3 Created On Sat Apr 09 02:51:55 IST 2016
C/FA/2285/2015 ORDER
and the above referred decision of this Court shows that the claimants
claim petition for compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act and
Workmen's Compensation Act are maintainable.