Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 43 (3.58 seconds)
Documents citing D.S. Nakara & Others vs Union Of India on 17 December, 1982

Yashwant Singh Son Of Shri Ranvir Singh vs State Of on 31 August, 2022

In D.S. Nakara [D.S. Nakara v. Union of India, (1983) 1 SCC 305, this Court had treated the pension retirees only, as a homogeneous class and all the pensioners governed by the 1972 Rules, were treated as a class, because payment of pension was a continuing obligation on the part of the State, till lifelong to the pensioners, unlike the beneficiaries of the Contributory Provident Fund. In the said case, it was never held that the pension retirees and the emplo ryees in service, constitute a homogeneous class. In R.L .
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 20 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Yashwant Singh Son Of Shri Ranvir Singh vs State Of on 31 August, 2022

In D.S. Nakara [D.S. Nakara v. Union of India, (1983) 1 SCC 305, this Court had treated the pension retirees only, as a homogeneous class and all the pensioners governed by the 1972 Rules, were treated as a class, because payment of pension was a continuing obligation on the part of the State, till lifelong to the pensioners, unlike the beneficiaries of the Contributory Provident Fund. In the said case, it was never held that the pension retirees and the emplo ryees in service, constitute a homogeneous class. In R.L .
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 20 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Yashwant Singh Son Of Shri Ranvir Singh vs State Of on 31 August, 2022

In D.S. Nakara [D.S. Nakara v. Union of India, (1983) 1 SCC 305, this Court had treated the pension retirees only, as a homogeneous class and all the pensioners governed by the 1972 Rules, were treated as a class, because payment of pension was a continuing obligation on the part of the State, till lifelong to the pensioners, unlike the beneficiaries of the Contributory Provident Fund. In the said case, it was never held that the pension retirees and the emplo ryees in service, constitute a homogeneous class. In R.L .
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 20 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Yashwant Singh Son Of Shri Ranvir Singh vs State Of on 31 August, 2022

In D.S. Nakara [D.S. Nakara v. Union of India, (1983) 1 SCC 305, this Court had treated the pension retirees only, as a homogeneous class and all the pensioners governed by the 1972 Rules, were treated as a class, because payment of pension was a continuing obligation on the part of the State, till lifelong to the pensioners, unlike the beneficiaries of the Contributory Provident Fund. In the said case, it was never held that the pension retirees and the emplo ryees in service, constitute a homogeneous class. In R.L .
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 20 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Yashwant Singh Son Of Shri Ranvir Singh vs State Of on 31 August, 2022

In D.S. Nakara [D.S. Nakara v. Union of India, (1983) 1 SCC 305, this Court had treated the pension retirees only, as a homogeneous class and all the pensioners governed by the 1972 Rules, were treated as a class, because payment of pension was a continuing obligation on the part of the State, till lifelong to the pensioners, unlike the beneficiaries of the Contributory Provident Fund. In the said case, it was never held that the pension retirees and the emplo ryees in service, constitute a homogeneous class. In R.L .
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 20 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Yashwant Singh Son Of Shri Ranvir Singh vs State Of on 31 August, 2022

In D.S. Nakara [D.S. Nakara v. Union of India, (1983) 1 SCC 305, this Court had treated the pension retirees only, as a homogeneous class and all the pensioners governed by the 1972 Rules, were treated as a class, because payment of pension was a continuing obligation on the part of the State, till lifelong to the pensioners, unlike the beneficiaries of the Contributory Provident Fund. In the said case, it was never held that the pension retirees and the emplo ryees in service, constitute a homogeneous class. In R.L .
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 20 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Yashwant Singh Son Of Shri Ranvir Singh vs State Of on 31 August, 2022

In D.S. Nakara [D.S. Nakara v. Union of India, (1983) 1 SCC 305, this Court had treated the pension retirees only, as a homogeneous class and all the pensioners governed by the 1972 Rules, were treated as a class, because payment of pension was a continuing obligation on the part of the State, till lifelong to the pensioners, unlike the beneficiaries of the Contributory Provident Fund. In the said case, it was never held that the pension retirees and the emplo ryees in service, constitute a homogeneous class. In R.L .
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 20 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Yashwant Singh Son Of Shri Ranvir Singh vs State Of on 31 August, 2022

In D.S. Nakara [D.S. Nakara v. Union of India, (1983) 1 SCC 305, this Court had treated the pension retirees only, as a homogeneous class and all the pensioners governed by the 1972 Rules, were treated as a class, because payment of pension was a continuing obligation on the part of the State, till lifelong to the pensioners, unlike the beneficiaries of the Contributory Provident Fund. In the said case, it was never held that the pension retirees and the emplo ryees in service, constitute a homogeneous class. In R.L .
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 20 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Yashwant Singh Son Of Shri Ranvir Singh vs State Of on 31 August, 2022

In D.S. Nakara [D.S. Nakara v. Union of India, (1983) 1 SCC 305, this Court had treated the pension retirees only, as a homogeneous class and all the pensioners governed by the 1972 Rules, were treated as a class, because payment of pension was a continuing obligation on the part of the State, till lifelong to the pensioners, unlike the beneficiaries of the Contributory Provident Fund. In the said case, it was never held that the pension retirees and the emplo ryees in service, constitute a homogeneous class. In R.L .
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 20 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Yashwant Singh Son Of Shri Ranvir Singh vs State Of on 31 August, 2022

In D.S. Nakara [D.S. Nakara v. Union of India, (1983) 1 SCC 305, this Court had treated the pension retirees only, as a homogeneous class and all the pensioners governed by the 1972 Rules, were treated as a class, because payment of pension was a continuing obligation on the part of the State, till lifelong to the pensioners, unlike the beneficiaries of the Contributory Provident Fund. In the said case, it was never held that the pension retirees and the emplo ryees in service, constitute a homogeneous class. In R.L .
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 20 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 Next