Mydeenkhan vs M.Rafee on 26 March, 2019
7. Countering the above submissions, the learned counsel appearing
for the second respondent/Insurance Company submitted that the deceased
was only a student pursuing I year course in B.E. Hence, the Tribunal has
fixed a sum of Rs.15,000/- as the monthly income of the deceased. The
judgment relied on by the Tribunal relates to the deceased pursuing final
year course and hence, the said judgment relied upon by the Tribunal, is not
applicable to the case on hand while fixing the notional monthly income of
Page No.5/11
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
C.M.A.No.3265 of 2019
the deceased. The learned counsel appearing for the second
respondent/Insurance Company further submitted that Rs.5 lakhs awarded
towards medical expenses also does not appear to be on the lower side.
Absolutely, the amounts awarded by the Tribunal are just and proper and the
same had been awarded by assigning well-considered reasons, and hence,
according to the learned counsel appearing for the second respondent-
Insurance Company, there is no reason to enhance the amount awarded by
the Tribunal and thus, he prayed for dismissing the appeal.